October 09, 2025 03:23 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Zubeen Garg death probe: Singer's cop cousin who accompanied him to Singapore arrested | India Mobile Congress and the country's success in telecom sector reflect strength of Aatmanirbhar Bharat vision: PM Modi | Delhi HC summons Red Chillies Ent., Netflix in Sameer Wankhede's defamation suit over Aryan Khan's The Ba***ds of Bollywood | No visa deal with India: UK PM Keir Starmer aims to enhance trade ties during his visit to South Asian country | Pakistan denies backing Trump’s 20-point Gaza peace plan amid domestic outrage | Five Pakistan fighter jets were shot down during Operation Sindoor, claims IAF chief | Ex-Pakistan captain Sana Mir says her controversial 'Azad Kashmir' remark was 'blown out of proportion' | Sonam Wangchuk's wife moves Supreme Court challenging activist's detention under NSA | India will never allow any humiliation: Putin praises 'balanced and wise leader' Modi slamming US tariffs | 'Any misadventure in the Sir Creek sector will invite a decisive response': Rajnath Singh warns Pakistan

UN rights experts welcome US review of lethal drone attacks

| | Apr 30, 2015, at 05:58 pm
New York, Apr 30 (IBNS): A group of United Nations independent experts on Wednesday welcomed the announcement by the United States Government of a review of two counter-terrorism operations involving the use of drones, while stressing the need for transparency and accountability.

“We welcome President Obama's apology to the families. All innocent victims of drone attacks deserve such an apology, regardless of their nationality,” the experts said in a statement released on Wednesday by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).

He said, “Authorities are often obliged to plan these sorts of counter-terrorism operations on the basis of factual hypotheses that cannot be adequately verified due to incomplete or conflicting information.”

They noted that the United States Government acknowledged the accidental killing of four individuals in counter-terrorism operations conducted in January in the border regions of Afghanistan and Pakistan involving the use of drones, following declassification of information related to the operations and disclosure to the public but added that it was important to go beyond that approach to such incidents.

“Purely ex post facto assessments into what has possibly gone wrong are important for the purposes of evaluating impact, identifying lessons learnt and putting in place operational arrangements to mitigate against repetition,” the experts noted.

They added, “However, they are not enough for a finding of State, as well as individual, responsibility.”

The experts, known as Special Rapporteurs, are part of the 'Special Procedures' of the Human Rights Council, which is the general name of the Council's independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world.

Their statement expressed hope that the commitment made by the US Government will provide new impetus towards a concerted response by the international community to the unresolved controversies surrounding the use of armed drones.

“Any plausible allegation of killing of or serious injury to civilians triggers the obligation to investigate,” said the experts' statement.

They added, “This is an obligation that is imposed by international human rights law and international humanitarian law on States using drones as well as on States on whose territory such technology is used.”

The experts added that whenever civilian casualties are suspected, a proper procedure should be in place to ascertain the facts and make them public with a view to securing accountability and reparations for the victims.

Among the experts, who work on an individual, voluntary, unpaid basis and are not UN staff, were the Special Rapporteurs on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism; on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; and on independence of judges and lawyers.

They stressed that, subject to redactions on the grounds of legitimate national security, their results must be open to public scrutiny, and, where appropriate, adequate reparation to victims and their families must be offered.

“According to internationally recognized legal standards, investigations must be prompt, impartial, independent and exhaustive,” said Juan Mendez, the Special Rapporteur on torture.

“Ultimately, the lawfulness of Government action should be subject to independent and effective judicial review, both at the domestic, and at the international level,” said Gabriela Knaul, the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers.

“The legal framework for maintaining international peace and the protection of the right to life is a coherent and well-established system,” said Christof Heyns, the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions.

He added, “States using drones have an obligation to respect international standards and prevent violations.”

Heyns cautioned against broad and permissive interpretations of the current international rules and standards, while Ben Emerson, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, pointed to the need for global unanimity.

“There are a number of legal questions on which there is either no clear international consensus, or where current practices and interpretations appear to need further discussion,” he said.

He added, “Only a legitimate consensus across the international community can pave the way to a sound, ethical and legal response to these questions.”

The experts' statement also stressed that armed drones should be used in a manner that is compatible with international law.

Photo: US Department of Defense/James L. Harper Jr.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu