June 14, 2026 12:30 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Tragedy in the skies: Five IAF personnel killed in AN-32 crash in Assam | 'Ask probe officers whether I hid anything': Abhishek Banerjee hits back after pre-dawn police search | Police storm Abhishek Banerjee's house at 3 am tracking aide, Mamata arrives; seizure list says 'NIL' | Big boost for India's security: DRDO successfully tests advanced missile shield | Indian-origin man jailed for 34 years in UK over horrific kidnap, torture and rape case | Mamata's nightmare deepens! Saayoni Ghosh, Dev, Rachana Banerjee among 19 rebel MPs seeking TMC split | Trump claims US 'ended war with Iran', Tehran yet to confirm a deal | Heartbreak for Indian sports: Manu Bhaker's mentor Jaspal Rana passes away at 49 | Three Indian seafarers, missing after US strike on tanker near Oman, confirmed dead | 'Choose your side': TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee's ultimatum to Mamata in open revolt against Abhishek
UK doctor struck off after misconduct case involving veil incident and suspension rule violations.
UK
Dr. Keith Wolverson. Photo: X/@TheGriftReport

UK doctor, suspended for asking Muslim patient to remove veil, is struck off the medical register

| @indiablooms | Apr 16, 2026, at 07:53 pm

London/IBNS: A UK-based doctor, Keith Wolverson, has been struck off the medical register following findings of professional misconduct linked to multiple incidents, including a consultation involving a Muslim patient.

The decision follows a series of tribunal hearings examining his conduct while working as a locum doctor in urgent care centres.

One of the key incidents occurred in May 2018 at Royal Stoke University Hospital, where Wolverson asked a patient to remove her niqab multiple times during a consultation.

The patient initially declined, citing religious reasons, but later complied after repeated requests.

The doctor stated that the request was made to assist communication, claiming difficulty in understanding her speech.

However, the tribunal found that the patient spoke fluent English and determined that the explanation provided was not accurate.

The patient later reported feeling discriminated against following the encounter.

The tribunal also examined other aspects of Wolverson’s conduct, including recorded comments regarding the English-speaking abilities of several patients and their relatives.

These remarks were deemed inappropriate during the proceedings.

It was further noted that the doctor did not engage with the patient’s husband during the consultation, citing concerns over his behaviour.

Breach of suspension conditions

Wolverson was suspended in 2022 for nine months after being found guilty of misconduct.

However, it later emerged that he continued to undertake locum work during the suspension period, contrary to regulatory instructions.

His failure to attend subsequent hearings and comply with tribunal requirements led to further scrutiny of his actions.

Tribunal findings and final decision

During a later review, Wolverson stated that he had reflected on his conduct and expressed regret.

The tribunal initially imposed conditions on his practice rather than extending the suspension, allowing him to return to work under supervision.

Subsequent proceedings found that he had disengaged from the regulatory process and failed to meet required standards.

The tribunal concluded that his actions posed an ongoing risk to public safety.

The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service ruled that removal from the medical register was necessary, stating that lesser sanctions would not adequately address the seriousness of the misconduct.

The decision to strike off Wolverson brings the case to a close, following multiple hearings and findings related to professional conduct and regulatory compliance.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.