May 18, 2025 06:28 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Centre picks Shashi Tharoor to head all-party delegation for 'exposing' Pak-backed terrorism globally | Rape convict, survivor express willingness to get married; exchange flowers in Supreme Court | 'Are nukes safe with irresponsible and rogue nation like Pakistan?': Rajnath Singh questions world | 'Go and apologise': Supreme Court slams Madhya Pradesh minister over remark against Colonel Sofiya Qureshi | 'Can timelines be imposed?': President Murmu's question to Supreme Court on Tamil Nadu verdict | 'Had Indira Gandhi been alive, I would've asked her why PoK was not taken back in Simla Agreement': Himanta Biswa Sarma | India's stand demanding vacation of Pak-occupied Kashmir unchanged: MEA | PM Modi visits Adampur Air Base days after Operation Sindoor | Jammu and Kashmir: Three Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists killed in encounter with security forces in Shopian | US: Two Indian students die in road mishap in Pennsylvania
Osama Bin Laden
WIKIMEDIA COMMONS

Qureshi’s refusal to call bin Laden terrorist sent a wrong message to the global community: Pakistan media

| @indiablooms | Jun 23, 2021, at 02:15 am

Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi’s recent refusal to call Osama bin Laden a terrorist in an interview with an Afghan media outlet is perplexing and defies logic and sends a wrong message to a global audience, leading Pakistani newspaper Dawn said in an editorial. The newspaper noted that there are times "to be diplomatic and parry sticky questions", but said Kasuri’s ‘non-committal comments” didn’t appear to be one of those instances.

Asked by Tolo News if he disagreed with Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan’s reference to Osama bin Laden as a "martyr" in the National Assembly - during a discussion last year on the US operation in Abbottabad that had killed the Al Qaeda chief - Qureshi stated that the prime minister’s remarks had been taken out of context.

“Well, again.Out of context. He (the PM) was quoted out of context. And, a particular section of the media pairs it up,” he said.

On being asked if he would disagree, the foreign minister paused for a while and then said: “I will let it pass.”

Dawn said Qureshi could have used the opportunity to clearly state that Pakistan considers the late Al Qaeda mastermind a terrorist. “However, his non-committal comments sent the wrong message to a global audience”.

Asserting that Pakistan’s top leadership needs to be absolutely clear when it comes to describing fighters like bin Laden, the editorial said during the heady days of the Afghan ‘jihad’ (Islamic Holy War), bin Laden and other ‘Afghan Arabs’ like him may have been in the good books of the US, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan due to their usefulness against the Soviets.

“But in the post-9/11 era, bin Laden’s activities fell within the purview of terrorism. At one time, Al Qaeda was considered public enemy number one for governments around the globe, with the terrorist outfit staging bloody attacks across the world, and targeting civilians without discrimination,” it said.

The editorial cautioned that thous after Osama bin Laden’s death, Al Qaeda’s destructive prowess might have waned, other, “even more bloodthirsty militants took its place, as Al Qaeda became the prototype for militants worldwide” and termed the self-styled Islamic State group, that emerged from the deserts of Iraq, as the new avatar of Al Qaeda in Iraq.

“Also, bin Laden was an ideological hero to many militants in Pakistan, who had no qualms about taking on the state and spilling the blood of the innocent. Few would disagree that bin Laden was the most influential religious militant of the current era, inspiring terrorist groups across the world with his ideology and tactics.

“Therefore, there should be no ‘ifs’ or ‘buts’ and the message our government should be sending to the world is that Osama bin Laden was very much a terrorist,” it added.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu