February 26, 2026 07:23 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'CBFC didn't apply mind': Kerala High Court stays Kerala Story 2 release | Operation Sindoor 2.0 will be stronger if India forced to launch: Top Army commander warns Pakistan | ‘Heads must roll!’ Supreme Court cracks down on NCERT textbook over judiciary chapter | ‘1.2 crore voters may be dropped’: Mamata Banerjee flags major concern over SIR list | India-US trade deal at risk? Trump imposes massive 126% duty on solar imports | ‘My life reflects this reality’: Shooter Tara Shahdeo recalls forced conversion amid Kerala Story 2 row | Modi begins Israel visit to boost defence, tech and strategic ties | Trump claims Pakistan PM told him he prevented 35 million deaths by stopping India-Pakistan conflict | Supreme Court's big move over Bengal SIR! Odisha, Jharkhand judicial officers allowed to complete revision process | ‘Kerala lives in harmony, film’s portrayal wrong’: Kerala High Court raps Kerala Story sequel makers

Military solution in South Sudan 'unacceptable', says Security Council, urging rivals to pursue dialogue

| | Aug 09, 2014, at 04:21 pm
New York, Aug 9 (IBNS) Expressing "grave alarm and concern" about the deteriorating security situation and looming humanitarian catastrophe and South Sudan, the United Nations Security Council on Friday urged President Salva Kiir and political rival Riek Machar to engage fully and inclusively in ongoing peace talks, and uphold their commitment to establish a transitional government.

Based on an a tentative deal reached between the two sides, whose political dispute has sparked eight months of bloodshed in the world’s youngest country, the deadline for setting up an transitional authority of national unity was August 10, and the Council on Friday underscored that the rivals’ actions “continuing to pursue a military solution to this conflict are unacceptable.”

In a Presidential Statement, Council members appealed to the parties to “finalize appropriate arrangements without further delay.” They also expressed their readiness to consider, in consultation with relevant partners, including Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) and the African Union (AU), “all appropriate measures, including targeted sanctions, against those who take action that undermines the peace, stability, and security of South Sudan, including those who prevent the implementation of these agreements.”

Through its statement , the Council expressed grave alarm and concern regarding the substantial deterioration of the political and security situation and developing humanitarian catastrophe in South Sudan resulting from the internal Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) political dispute and unrelenting violence, including against civilians, caused by the country’s political and military leaders since December 15, 2013.

“The Security Council urgently calls upon President Salva Kiir, former Vice President Riek Machar and all parties to implement the Agreement to Resolve the Crisis in South Sudan signed on May 9, 2014 by…South Sudan and the SPLM/A (in Opposition), to engage fully and inclusively in ongoing peace talks in Addis Ababa, and uphold their commitment to establish a Transitional Government of National Unity.”

Further to the statement, the Council strongly condemned violations of human rights and international humanitarian law and reminds the parties that under international law, such acts constitute war crimes or crimes against humanity.

Regarding the humanitarian situation, the Council underlines the deep concern about the dramatic food insecurity in South Sudan, which may result soon in famine. The Council calls on UN Member States to provide the funds for humanitarian agencies deliver promptly relief to desperate people and communities.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.