September 21, 2026 01:36 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Arvind Kejriwal, family ‘missing’ from Delhi voter list, claims Aam Aadmi Party | ‘No UPI above ₹2,000?’ Ghaziabad traders put up ‘cash only’ hoardings | Trump signs Russia sanctions bill: India faces fresh 100% tariff threat over Moscow oil | Caught using ChatGPT for exam answers, IIT Bombay student dies by suicide; students protest | Congress' Nandigram candidate arrested after Mamata's support amid TMC symbol row; Bengal bypoll gets chaotic | Gurugram murder shocker: Groom-to-be leaves sisters at Delhi restaurant to meet ex-colleague, found dead days later | Delhi horror: Teen allegedly gangraped, stabbed to death and dumped in field; dogs eat parts of body | TMC name, symbol frozen: EC tells rival factions to pick new identities ahead of Bengal bypolls | Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests
Iran-China
A wide view of the UN Security Council meeting as members vote on the draft resolution. Photo: UN Photo/Eric Kanalstein

Iran sanctions: UN Security Council blocks China-Russia resolution

| @indiablooms | Sep 27, 2025, at 09:06 am

A resolution to extend sanctions relief to Iran under a 2015 nuclear deal failed to pass in the UN Security Council on Friday.

China and Russia tabled the draft which received four votes in favour, nine against and two abstentions.

The text sought to extend the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) for six months until next April, as well as Council resolution 2231(2015) that endorsed it. It also encouraged continued engagement between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Sanctions ‘snapback’

The rejection means that sanctions that were lifted under the deal will be re-imposed starting on Saturday evening.

The development comes a month after three European countries that signed the agreement – France, Germany and the United Kingdom – notified the Council about what they described as Iran’s “significant non-performance” and violations, thus triggering the so-called “snapback mechanism”.

China’s representative deeply regretted that the resolution was not adopted and called for upholding regional peace and stability.

“A breakdown in the Iranian nuclear issue could trigger a new regional security crisis which runs counter to common interests of the international community,” he said.

Ambassador Barbara Woodward explained why the UK voted no, saying “as this Council knows, Iran is defying the global non-proliferation regime”. Furthermore, its nuclear escalation has been detailed in over 60 IAEA reports over the past six years.

“Iran’s actions mean that the IAEA is unable to confirm that Iran’s nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful,” she said.

“Among the steps Iran has taken is the accumulation of a High Enriched Uranium stockpile which lacks any credible civilian justification and is unprecedented for a State without a nuclear weapons programme.”

United States Deputy Representative Dorothy Shea was pleased that the Council rejected what she called “this last-ditch effort by the Russian Federation and China”, calling the text “a hollow effort to relieve Iran of any accountability for its continued significant non-performance of its nuclear commitments.”

Russia’s Deputy Permanent Representative Dmitry Polyanskiy addressed nations who refused to support the draft.

“Now, there certainly are no longer any illusions,” he said.  “These countries have definitively demonstrated that all of their assurances about their focus on arriving at a diplomatic resolution to the Iranian nuclear programme issue for all of these years, were mere noise.”

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.