September 30, 2026 01:28 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
SIR row: Supreme Court to hear plea against CEC Gyanesh Kumar next week | Sambhal violence case: SC quashes key accused Mulla Afroz's NSA detention, slaps Rs 10 lakh cost on UP govt | Nandigram bypoll twist: Calcutta HC grants interim bail to Congress candidate Milan Pradhan till Oct 21 | Myanmar military airstrike horror: 49 killed, 58 injured as bombs hit crowded Rakhine market | Britain reopens refugee routes for Afghans, Palestinians as immigration and integration battle intensifies | New York Times executive shot dead: Elderly in-laws arrested amid bitter family feud over his 'trans' identity | Vijay's TVK makes Bengal entry: First party office opens in Purba Bardhaman amid state's political shake-up | SRFTI clash erupts over ABGP event: Students allege assault; BJP calls it ‘ugly face of Leftists’ | 'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained
Iran rejects US peace proposal. Photo composed by Gemini.

Iran rejects US peace proposal, says war will end only on its terms

| @indiablooms | Mar 25, 2026, at 10:45 pm

Iran has rejected a proposal from the United States to end the ongoing conflict, declaring that any ceasefire will happen only on its own terms and conditions, media reports said.

A senior Iranian official, speaking to state media, described Washington’s proposal as “excessive” and reiterated that Tehran will continue its military response until its demands are met.

“Iran will end the war when it decides to do so,” the official said, warning of continued retaliation against US actions.

Tehran has made it clear that negotiations will not resume unless a set of key conditions are fulfilled.

These include a complete halt to what it calls aggression by the US and Israel, guarantees against future military action, and compensation for war-related losses.

Iran has also insisted that any agreement must apply across all fronts in the region, including armed groups aligned with it, and reaffirm its sovereignty over the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz.

The rejection reflects deep mistrust in Tehran, with the official accusing Washington of past deception during earlier negotiations. Iran cited previous instances of military action as proof that the US did not engage in talks in good faith.

The latest tensions follow strikes launched on February 28 by the US and Israel, which, according to Iranian accounts, killed top leadership figures including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei along with senior military officials.

What did the US propose?

According to officials familiar with the discussions, the US plan included sanctions relief in exchange for curbs on Iran’s nuclear and missile programmes, as well as reopening shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz. It also reportedly called for limits on Iran’s support to regional armed groups.

Global stakes rise

The conflict has already had significant global repercussions. Iran’s restrictions on movement through the Strait of Hormuz — a route for nearly a fifth of the world’s oil supply — have driven up energy prices and raised fears of a wider economic shock.

Casualties continue to mount across the region. Iranian authorities say over 1,500 people have been killed, while deaths have also been reported in Israel, among US personnel, and in parts of the wider Middle East.

With both sides holding firm, prospects for a negotiated settlement appear increasingly uncertain, raising concerns of a prolonged and more volatile conflict.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.