April 17, 2026 08:14 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote | 'Women won't spare you': PM Modi warns Opposition over resistance to quota bill | Vijay booked in 3 cases over poll code violation ahead of Tamil Nadu polls | 'Black law': Stalin burns copy of 'delimitation' bill, slams Modi govt | TCS halts Nashik BPO operations amid sexual abuse, conversion allegations | ‘We are surprised’: SC stays Pawan Khera’s bail over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife | Historic shift: Bihar gets first BJP CM as Samrat Choudhary takes oath | 'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping
Photo: wikipedia.org

‘Created unnecessary danger’: Canada’s spy watchdog slams sudden halt to CSIS overseas operation

| @indiablooms | May 31, 2025, at 10:11 pm

Ottawa: A new report by Canada’s spy watchdog has sharply criticised a mid-operation suspension of an overseas Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) mission, calling it an act that “created unnecessary danger for the CSIS team” and undermined Canada’s global standing, according to a CBC report.

The National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA) said it found no documentation showing that the decision to pause the CSIS operation was made by either the spy agency’s director or the minister of public safety.

In contrast to routine operational matters, the case reportedly involved high-level political actors across the federal government.

While the nature and location of the mission remain classified in the heavily redacted report, the agency made clear that halting the mission mid-course had consequences.

The abrupt decision harmed Canada’s international reputation, put intelligence officers at avoidable risk, and “raises serious concerns regarding CSIS’s accountability mechanisms,” the review said.

The situation unfolded in September 2022, when then-public safety minister Marco Mendicino requested that NSIRA assess whether CSIS and the Public Safety Department were adequately supporting ministerial responsibility.

Though the sensitive operation was eventually allowed to continue, the report describes a chaotic and confused chain of decision-making during the delay.

Senior CSIS officials reportedly struggled to manage the fallout from the interruption.

At one point, the CSIS director wrote to top officials within key security and intelligence portfolios: “Time is quickly running out and the situation is getting much more tense on the ground. We need a decision tomorrow.”

The review also noted uncertainty around who held the authority to restart the mission, compounding internal confusion.

NSIRA concluded that both CSIS and the Public Safety Department failed in their duty to provide “timely and accurate information” to the minister regarding key aspects of the operation.

The agency warned that the current system of ministerial oversight and accountability for CSIS “is in need of serious attention.”

To prevent such failures in future, NSIRA recommends that any decision affecting an ongoing CSIS operation—if not made by the director or authorised delegates—must come directly from the public safety minister and must be documented in writing.

It also called on the minister to ensure that the department’s deputy minister has access to all necessary information to offer independent, informed advice on intelligence activities.

“Building a stronger system now will help prepare for future operations and reduce the likelihood of a repeat of past confusion and risk,” the report said.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.