April 24, 2024 23:40 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Centre moves Supreme Court seeking modification of 2012 verdict in 2G spectrum case | 'Robert Vadra Ab Ki Baar' posters in Amethi as suspense looms over Congress candidate | Sam Pitroda's comment on wealth distribution stirs row, Congress distances itself, Amit Shah says 'party exposed' | Renowned dancer and ex-professor at Chennai academy arrested on sexual harassment charges | 'Has anyone robbed your mangalsutra during Congress rule?' Priyanka Gandhi counters PM's charge
Pakistan court grants PTI chief Imran Khan interim bail in seven cases Imran Khan
Image: Imran Khan Facebook page

Pakistan court grants PTI chief Imran Khan interim bail in seven cases

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 27 Mar 2023, 04:46 pm

Islamabad:  The Islamabad High Court on Monday granted interim bail to  Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan in seven different cases against him till Apr 6.

The case was heard by a bench headed by IHC CJ Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb.

The PTI chief had arrived at IHC from Lahore, earlier today, to seek pre-arrest bail in different cases registered against him in the federal capital, reports Geo News.

Multiple cases were registered against the former prime minister at Islamabad's Ramna, CTD and Golra police stations.

At the outset of the hearing, Khan's lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar appeared in the court and contended that the objection related to bio-metric verification shouldn't be imposed on individuals above the age of 60.

At this, Justice Farooq remarked that the bio-metric verification had become very easy now.

The lawyer maintained that they had acquired PTI chief's protective bail from Lahore High Court (LHC) after which they arrived at the judicial complex but they weren't allowed to move further.

"More FIRs against Imran Khan were lodged that day," he added.

At this, IHC CJ asked the lawyer to clarify why had they bypassed a forum to reach IHC.

"Why didn't you go to the trial court first when you have to go there ultimately," he asked.

At this, the lawyer maintained that he would present Supreme Court's judgements in this regard.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.