June 04, 2026 05:50 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Cabinet approves Rs. 10,000 crore support package to stabilise ATF prices for airlines | Delhi hotel inferno kills 21, many foreign nationals among victims | Mamata's TMC splits wide open as 58 MLAs back expelled Ritabrata as Bengal LoP | Cockroach Janta Party goes offline: Abhijeet Dipke set to return to Delhi, plans Jantar Mantar protest over exam lapses | 'You're f***ing crazy': Trump blasts Netanyahu over Israel's escalation in Lebanon | What began as a domestic dispute ended in six deaths in US: Iowa community in shock | India, Australia take defence ties to next level with major security push | Will Annamalai float his own party? Cryptic Coimbatore posters spark buzz | 'Fake signature' row: TMC expels MLAs Ritabrata Banerjee, Sandipan Saha over 'anti-party activities' | 'Fake signature' probe: CID forms SIT; Abhishek Banerjee skips Bhavani Bhavan summon, seeks more time

Supreme Court directs BCCI to postpone elections

| | Dec 10, 2014, at 10:29 pm
New Delhi, Dec 10 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to defer its elections, scheduled to be held on Dec 17, till end of January.

The Supreme Court, which on Tuesday asked BCCI to take action against its president in exile N Srinivasan's son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan in connection with the Indian Premier League (IPL) scam, said the postponement of AGM is necessary as the hearing in the matter will not end before Dec 17.

The next hearing is on Dec 15.

N Srinivasan meanwhile has sought the court's permission to contest the BCCI polls but assured that he will keep away from all IPL matters.

Srinivasan, who is already the chairman of the International Cricket Council (ICC), is seeking another term as BCCI president.

The apex court had asked Srinivasan to withdraw from BCCI.

The apex court also said a new committee should be formed to take action against those named by the Mudgal panel probing the IPL scam.

It also said that the  BCCI governing council should take action.

Mudgal panel was also asked to take action.

This comes after Srinivasan was accused of taking no action against Meiyappan.

The court has clearly stated that it wants Meiyappan to be punished.

The Supreme Court gave some time to the BCCI to come up with solutions on Tuesday itself and said it would also propose action against Chennai Super Kings and  Meiyappan.

Replying to BCCI, Srinivasan's lawyers suggested  five options in connection with the matter.

The first suggestion said the matter should be handed to BCCI Behaviour Committee (the committee exists and includes Ravi Shastri, Arindam Ganguly, Amitabh Choudhary, Sanjay Patel and one more official).

In a second suggestion, the lawyer said the matter should be refereed to BCCI-appointed independent committee.

Thirdly, the Supreme Court should nominate a committee of BCCI officials.

The fourth one included an appointment of a two-member committee of retired judges by the SC to deal with the matter.

The lawyers also suggested that Justice Mudgal panel should look into the matter

Srinivasan was seeking a clean chit from the Supreme Court to contest the BCCI elections and win another term as president.

Suspended BCCI President petitioned that he may be restored to his position as BCCI chief and be allowed to function.

The Mudgal Committee, which submitted its report on Nov 17, had indicted Meiyappan and Rajasthan Royals franchise co-owner Raj Kundra of betting and confirmed their role in their teams but cleared Srinivasan of match fixing and scuttling the probe.

The probe report has charged Srinivasan with "covering up" Meiyappan's role.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.