September 20, 2026 10:22 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Arvind Kejriwal, family ‘missing’ from Delhi voter list, claims Aam Aadmi Party | ‘No UPI above ₹2,000?’ Ghaziabad traders put up ‘cash only’ hoardings | Trump signs Russia sanctions bill: India faces fresh 100% tariff threat over Moscow oil | Caught using ChatGPT for exam answers, IIT Bombay student dies by suicide; students protest | Congress' Nandigram candidate arrested after Mamata's support amid TMC symbol row; Bengal bypoll gets chaotic | Gurugram murder shocker: Groom-to-be leaves sisters at Delhi restaurant to meet ex-colleague, found dead days later | Delhi horror: Teen allegedly gangraped, stabbed to death and dumped in field; dogs eat parts of body | TMC name, symbol frozen: EC tells rival factions to pick new identities ahead of Bengal bypolls | Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests

ICC clarifies role of Ian Pont in BPL 2013 investigations

| | Jul 19, 2014, at 07:12 am
Dubai, July 18 (IBNS) Following the earlier announcement by the International Cricket Council (ICC) and BCB of their decision to appeal against the decision of the BCB’s anti-corruption tribunal, the ICC has clarified matters surrounding the involvement of Ian Pont, the Dhaka Gladiators’ coach, in the BPL 2013 investigations as this has been greatly mischaracterised to his detriment.

The ICC said Pont complied at all times with his obligations under the BCB Anti-Corruption Code and promptly reported the corrupt approach that he had received from the Managing Director of the Dhaka Gladiators, Shihab (Jishan) Chowdhury.

He subsequently provided great assistance to the ICC ACSU in its investigation of the matter.

“Indeed, it was the evidence that Mr Pont provided that led to the Tribunal upholding the main charge brought in these proceedings, against Mr Chowdhury,” an ICC spokesman said in  statement.

The ICC emphasised that Pont did not participate in any way in the fixing of any match during the 2013 Bangladesh Premier League and at no time instructed anyone to play other than to the best of their abilities. 

"Following his reporting to the ACSU of the approach he had received, Mr Pont at all times acted with the knowledge of, and under the direction of, the ACSU, assisting them in investigating the scope of the corrupt activities," the ICC said in a statement on Friday.

The ICC said any suggestion that Pont accepted a bribe to be part of the fix is also completely baseless.

“The US$6,000 referred to in the Tribunal's decision was accepted and kept by Mr Pont, on the instructions of the ACSU, because he was owed that amount and more under his contract with the Dhaka Gladiators.  To this day Mr Pont still has not received the total sum due to him under that contract,” the spokesman clarified.

ICC Chief Executive David Richardson commended Mr Pont for following the Anti-Corruption Code and assisting the ACSU in its investigations.

“The actions of Ian Pont in reporting the corrupt approach and then helping the ACSU to establish the extent of the corruption are to be highly commended.  On behalf of the ICC, the ACSU and the sport of cricket in general, I wish to express my thanks to Mr Pont for all that he has done to uphold the integrity of the sport of cricket.  The sport would benefit greatly if it contained more men of Mr Pont’s integrity and quality,” said  Richardson.


 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.