July 12, 2025 10:23 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Canada is not your playground': Khalistani terrorist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun's threat to Kapil Sharma | 'Don't jump into conclusions, wait for final report of Air India crash probe': Civil Aviation Minister | IIM Calcutta student alleges rape at boys' hostel amid uproar over Kasba incident | Preliminary investigation report shows both engines of crashed Air India flight shut down seconds after take-off | Pardon by Yemeni national's family is only hope for Indian nurse Nimisha Priya: Activist | S Jaishankar likely to visit China this weekend for the first time in 5 years: Report | 'Show me one photo of Indian damage': Ajit Doval slams foreign media over Op Sindoor reportage | Tennis player Radhika Yadav was shot four times by her father: Autopsy report | Pakistani actress Humaira Asghar, whose decomposed body was recovered from Karachi flat, died 9 months ago: Report | Radhika Yadav's death: Father spent 2.5 crore on tennis
Gautam Gambhir
Image: BCCI Twitter page

Decision to rotate between Wriddhiman Saha, Pant has been unfair on both: Gautam Gambhir

| @indiablooms | Dec 26, 2020, at 12:45 am

New Delhi/UNI: Former India cricketer Gautam Gambhir feels that the Indian team management has made players 'insecure' by constant chopping and changing and the decision to rotate between Wriddhiman Saha and Rishabh Pant, based on conditions has been unfair on both the wicketkeepers.

India on Friday announced their playing XI for the 2nd Test of the Border Gavaskar Trophy and Saha was dropped due to his poor batting form in the opening game.

Gambhir asked whether the team management will do the same with Pant if he fails in the next two games.

''It's unfortunate and Wriddhiman Saha has played just one Test match in this series and he hasn't done well and gets dropped.

''Imagine what happens to Pant if he doesn’t do well in this Test or the third Test. What do you do then? Would you go back to Wriddhiman Saha,'' Gambhir questioned on YouTube channel 'Sports Today'.

For Gambhir, it’s not lip-service but actions that make players secure, something that this current regime has failed, according to him.

According to Gambhir, every player wants security and assurance, which current regime has failed to do.

''That’s why this team looks so unsettled because no one is secured. Professional sport is all about security. Everyone has talent when they are representing the country. All they want is security and that assurance that we are there to back you, not just by words but by action,'' he said.

The former opener also mentioned that no other team apart from India rotates wicketkeeper based on conditions.

''Actually, it's been unfair on Rishabh Pant and Wriddhiman Saha both over a long period of time when they have picked and chosen players on conditions. You don’t do that with wicketkeepers. You do that with bowlers,'' he said.

''In overseas conditions, you play two spinners based on conditions, its understandable, but which other teams in the world has chopped and changed wicketkeepers based on conditions. No one apart from India,'' he added.

The veteran batsman also said that bowlers, and not wicketkeepers, should be picked according to conditions and rubbished the one keeper for home and one for away theory.

''I have never believed in this theory of rotation policy that Wriddhiman Saha is only good for sub-continent and Rishabh Pant is better overseas because that’s not how good teams go into.

If you are good in Indian conditions, you got to deliver in overseas conditions as well. Whether he does that or not is irrelevant,'' he said. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.