September 18, 2026 01:53 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests | Gurugram biker crash: Main accused Kalyan Bainsla sent to police custody for 2 days | ‘Just tax collection’: Ashneer Grover slams new UPI charges above Rs 2,000 | India condemns Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia, warns of threat to Red Sea shipping | Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed | Gurugram horror caught on camera: ‘I felt unsafe’—car chases, rams woman biker and flees | BRICS veg menu row: ‘Why shouldn’t we showcase it?’—Harsh Goenka hits back after Rahul Gandhi’s ‘80%’ remark | India-UAE Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in focus: Modi meets Abu Dhabi Crown Prince on BRICS sidelines | Xi Jinping lands in India for BRICS; big Modi meeting set for New Delhi
IND-AUS
Photo Courtesy/UNI

Cummins' captaincy swung the finals in Australia's favour: Suresh Raina

| @indiablooms | Nov 22, 2023, at 06:06 am

Amhedabad/UNI: Former India international cricketer Suresh Raina said on Tuesday that Australia captain Pat Cummins' captaincy made the difference in the Cricket World Cup Final.

"What swung the game in Australia’s favour was Pat Cummins’ captaincy. The way he brought Glenn Maxwell into the attack to get the wicket of Rohit Sharma with a brilliant catch from Travis Head was very smart. Adam Zampa was great too, as was Cummins himself in dismissing Virat Kohli," Raina said.

They outplayed India and were very solid in their planning, he said.

From an Indian perspective, the Cricket World Cup final was disappointing, but that’s what cricket is all about, Raina said.

"Australia played better than India; you can't complain about that. It was just one bad day at the office," he said.

He said Australia won the toss, and they knew that dew would be the key factor. They restricted India to 240 and chased really well, an ICC media release said.

"Another big factor was Australia’s fielding; I think they saved 30 to 40 runs. From ball one, they were saving a lot of singles and boundaries. There was Travis’s catch and some excellent work in the deep from David Warner and Marnus Labuschagne," Raina said.

"I think Cummins showed real temperament in his captaincy. He changed his bowlers, knowing he could put pressure on each Indian batter even though they were all in such good form. His tactics made all the difference, and his planning and execution were perfect," he said.

"If you look at Australia’s innings, they were 47 for three, but India couldn’t put the pressure on because they were only defending 241, and then Travis Head played the best knock of the World Cup to change the direction of the game with his positive batting," Raina said.

He said India looked very good from a bowling point of view but were left disappointed because they didn’t understand the wicket.

Raina said it was very dry, and they couldn’t keep pressure on with the bat because Australia bowled a lot of short balls and deliveries into the wicket, which meant India couldn’t rotate the strike. Rohit’s wicket was a turning point, and there were not enough runs on the board, especially when you’re used to making totals of up to 400.

He said credit goes to Travis and Marnus; the way they played when the pressure started to come back on Australia showed they knew how to win an ICC trophy.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.