March 12, 2026 11:19 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
America’s flip-flop on Russian oil: How Washington sends conflicting signals to India | Big diplomatic win! Iran allows Indian oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz | ‘It was over in the first hour’: Trump declares victory in Iran war, says ‘nothing left to target’ | Indian-origin shopkeepers face targeted attacks in Wembley; Somali men suspected | Iran pulls out of 2026 FIFA World Cup amid war with US-Israel | Supreme Court allows first-ever passive euthanasia for 32-year-old man in coma for 13 years | As Iran-US war disrupts global gas supply, India issues guidelines to manage shortages | LPG crisis hits metros: Commercial cylinder shortage triggers panic as govt prioritises domestic supply | Iran war disrupts LPG supplies, restaurants in major Indian cities edge towards shutdown | ‘How dare you question judicial officers?’: SC raps Bengal SIR pleas, orders appellate tribunals for voter list appeals
Jana Nayagan was scheduled to release on Jan 9. Photo: Official X.

‘Jana Nayagan’ producers move Madras High Court to withdraw plea against CBFC

| @indiablooms | Feb 09, 2026, at 10:53 pm

The producers of actor Vijay-starrer Jana Nayagan have submitted a letter to the Madras High Court Registry seeking to withdraw their writ petition against the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), after agreeing to have the film referred to the revising committee.

According to The Hindu's sources, the petition is likely to be listed under the caption “For Withdrawal” before Justice P.T. Asha on Tuesday (February 10, 2026).

Vijayan Subramanian, counsel-on-record for KVN Productions LLP, has conveyed the production house’s decision not to pursue the litigation any further.

The film, originally scheduled for release on January 9, 2026, was reviewed by the CBFC’s five-member examination committee on December 19, 2025.

The producers claim they received a communication on December 22 stating that the film could be granted a U/A 16+ certificate, subject to certain excisions.

KVN Productions accepted the recommendation and carried out the suggested cuts instead of appealing to the nine-member revising committee for a ‘U’ certificate.

The edited version of the film was resubmitted to the CBFC on December 24, 2025.

However, during this period, a member of the CBFC’s monitoring committee lodged a complaint with CBFC Chairman Prasoon Joshi, alleging procedural lapses in the certification process.

In the complaint, the member claimed that the film contained visuals and dialogues depicting foreign powers allegedly instigating large-scale religious conflict in India, which could disturb communal harmony.

The complaint also noted that, despite multiple references to the Indian Army, no defence expert had been included on the examination committee.

The monitoring committee member further alleged that objections raised during the screening on December 19 were not considered, terming it a “gross violation” of the Cinematograph Act and Rules, and urged the CBFC chairman to direct a re-examination of the film.

The delay in the film’s certification and release has reportedly caused concern within the Tamil film industry, which has been closely tracking the outcome of the censor dispute.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.