June 24, 2026 04:00 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
No Hindi, no NEET: Vijay reignites Tamil Nadu's biggest political flashpoints | Messi creates World Cup history with record-breaking double; Mbappe equals Klose's mark hours later | Tech giant Oracle slashes 21,000 jobs while betting big on AI | 'Italy and I never beg': Meloni fires back at Trump over G7 photo claim | No more 'brother': Stalin's formal birthday greeting to Rahul reflects deepening rift | TMC seeks disqualification of 20 rebel MPs, Abhishek says 'membership should go' | Nara Lokesh pitches Andhra Pradesh as investment hub during Kolkata visit, sets $2.4 trillion economy goal | 'Least restrictive option': Setback for Telegram as Delhi HC backs Centre's ban ahead of NEET-UG re-test | Fortuner torched, BJP leaders burnt alive: Sand mining feud ends in triple murder in Chhattisgarh | 'If Modi is the leader and India is attacked, we'll be there': Trump's strong assurance at G7
The new policy requires most green card applicants to apply for permanent residency from their home countries instead of from within the US. Photo: AI composed.

'We need smart people': Trump green card rule sparks tech backlash; LinkedIn, Coursera founders slam move

| @indiablooms | May 26, 2026, at 11:28 pm

A new immigration policy introduced by the administration of Donald Trump has triggered sharp criticism from the US technology sector, with several prominent startup founders warning that the move could damage America’s innovation ecosystem and AI leadership.

The policy requires most green card applicants to apply for permanent residency from their home countries instead of from within the United States — a major shift that could affect international students, skilled workers and tech employees already living in the country.

LinkedIn co-founder raises alarm over AI talent

Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn, questioned the impact the rule could have on America’s AI workforce.

“Does this mean AI researchers, employees, and students will now have to leave the country and wait through a backlog process to continue their work?” Hoffman wrote in a post, calling the decision a “harmful move for tech, business, and America broadly.”

Coursera founder calls policy ‘capricious attack’

Andrew Ng, co-founder of Coursera and a leading AI expert, described the policy as a “capricious attack” on legal immigration.

Ng warned that the change would hurt families and reduce the number of skilled professionals entering the US workforce, including doctors, scientists and teachers.

He also cautioned that America’s competitiveness in artificial intelligence would suffer as a result of the restrictions.

Y Combinator founder says US needs ‘smart people’

Garry Tan, head of startup accelerator Y Combinator, also criticised the policy, calling it “bad and misguided”.

“The US needs smart people in the country to build the future and businesses,” Tan said.

USCIS defends new Green Card policy

The policy was outlined in a recent memo issued by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), which reiterated that student and temporary work visas are meant for short-term stays and should not automatically become a pathway to permanent residency.

USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler defended the move, saying the policy would help immigration laws function “as intended”.

“When aliens apply from their home country, it reduces the need to find and remove those who decide to slip into the shadows and remain in the US illegally after being denied residency,” he said.

The agency added that green cards would only be granted from within the United States under “extraordinary circumstances.”

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.