September 25, 2026 05:43 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation | Opposition readies fresh impeachment push against Gyanesh Kumar over SIR report | ‘Resign in 48 hours or face nationwide agitation’: CJP’s ultimatum to Gyanesh Kumar over SIR row | IIT Bombay student’s parents begin hunger strike, demand arrest of officials | Nandigram bypoll shock: Calcutta HC shields Congress candidate Milan Pradhan in 2007 case, but will he walk free? | ‘I don’t care if you die’: Driver’s chilling response before Noida bus went up in flames | Contempt case against CEC Gyanesh Kumar? Supreme Court advocate seeks AG's consent | Days after Jamui outrage, another girl sexually harassed in Bihar; 4 arrested | 9 burnt to death as sleeper bus carrying 35 catches fire on Noida highway | ‘Gyanesh, it’s done bro!’: CJP turns up heat on CEC after explosive SIR report
Several small businesses & US states challenged the Trump tariffs in the Supreme Court. Photo: ChatGPT.

Major setback for Trump! US Supreme Court invalidates tariffs, citing constitutional overreach

| @indiablooms | Feb 20, 2026, at 10:30 pm

In a major legal setback for President Donald Trump, the US Supreme Court on Friday struck down his sweeping tariffs, ruling that he exceeded his authority by imposing them under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The 6-3 decision, authored by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, emphasized that the Constitution grants Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs.

The Court noted that if Congress had intended to give the president such authority under IEEPA, it would have done so explicitly.

Joining Roberts in the majority were three liberal justices and three conservative justices, while Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito dissented, media reports said.

In April 2025, Trump announced “reciprocal” tariffs on imports from many countries, claiming they were essential to protect US economic security and address trade deficits.

Small businesses and several US states challenged the tariffs, arguing that the administration was turning emergency powers into a “blank cheque” for tariff-making.

By December 2025, the Treasury had collected over $133 billion from these tariffs, and the Congressional Budget Office estimated their long-term economic impact could reach $3 trillion over the next decade.

Companies like Costco have already filed lawsuits seeking refunds.

Legal experts say the ruling reinforces Congress’s exclusive authority to impose taxes and marks a significant limitation on presidential economic powers.

However, the administration may attempt to reimpose tariffs through other legal avenues in the future.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.