July 02, 2026 06:45 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ram Mandir donation theft: Six accused were employed by Varanasi-based security firm, probe reveals | Ayodhya Ram Temple donation theft: Probe says majority of money was allegedly stolen during Kumbh Mela | Commercial LPG price slashed by Rs 183.50 from July 1; check new rates in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai | Trump suffers major blow as US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship | Delhi-Mumbai Expressway horror: Passenger bus goes up in flames after fatal collision, 8 dead | 'Dharmendra Pradhan will be responsible if anything happens': CJP warns as Sonam Wangchuk's health worsens on day 3 of hunger strike | Adani Ports seals $1.4 billion mega deal as MSC buys 49% stake in Vizhinjam port | Ram Temple donation scam: Former trust chief Champat Rai grilled by SIT for 2 hours, says report | Brazil escape Japan scare, Germany crash out as Paraguay script World Cup shocker | India overtakes Taiwan, South Korea to become world's fifth-largest equity market again

Kremlin says Putin's approval rating based on citizens' assessment of Presidential work

| @indiablooms | May 31, 2019, at 04:19 pm

Moscow, May 31 (Sputnik/UNI) Approval rating of Russian President Vladimir Putin is formed by the assessment of his work by Russian citizens, and sociology is often wrong calculating this approval, Kremiln spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Friday.

On Wednesday, Russian pollster VTsIOM head Valery Fedorov said that Putin’s personal rating was decreasing as Russians "did not believe that life would be better tomorrow than today" as their income was not growing for the past five years.

"You know, there are no different presidential ratings. The president has one rating, which it is formed by how people assess the results of the president's work. ... Of course, we closely monitor various data. It is often completely contrary to what we get from citizens in reality," Peskov said, answering a question whether the Kremlin was satisfied with the new VTsIOM data and what methods of rating calculation were more trusted.

The spokesman noted that sociology was often wrong in calculations of presidential rating, adding that the Kremlin highly appreciated the work of Russian sociologists and monitored results of their work.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.