September 25, 2026 05:11 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation | Opposition readies fresh impeachment push against Gyanesh Kumar over SIR report | ‘Resign in 48 hours or face nationwide agitation’: CJP’s ultimatum to Gyanesh Kumar over SIR row | IIT Bombay student’s parents begin hunger strike, demand arrest of officials | Nandigram bypoll shock: Calcutta HC shields Congress candidate Milan Pradhan in 2007 case, but will he walk free? | ‘I don’t care if you die’: Driver’s chilling response before Noida bus went up in flames | Contempt case against CEC Gyanesh Kumar? Supreme Court advocate seeks AG's consent | Days after Jamui outrage, another girl sexually harassed in Bihar; 4 arrested | 9 burnt to death as sleeper bus carrying 35 catches fire on Noida highway | ‘Gyanesh, it’s done bro!’: CJP turns up heat on CEC after explosive SIR report
Curtis Wright with his family. Representative Photo: Google Gemini

‘I thought they were after murderers’: Canadian man in ICE detention challenges US immigration policy

| @indiablooms | Feb 27, 2026, at 12:02 am

A Canadian man detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) says he was shocked to find himself held in a US immigration facility after believing the agency targeted only “criminals and murderers", as his family presses legal efforts for his release.

Curtis Wright, 39, has been in South Texas ICE Processing Center for several months after being stopped at a US port of entry, according to reporting by CTV News.

In comments shared with media, he said he did not expect to be detained because he believed ICE’s enforcement focus was on the most serious offenders.

“Before I came in here, I was of the mind that they were doing what they said they were doing, where they were focusing on the worst of the worst, criminals and murderers,” he said, as reported by CTV News.

His remarks come amid ongoing controversy over ICE’s detention practices and enforcement priorities under US immigration policy, which government officials have repeatedly framed as targeting serious offenders but which advocates say increasingly includes nonviolent and minor offences.

In recent years, data has shown a significant portion of individuals held by ICE, including those without criminal convictions, are detained for immigration violations alone, contradicting official crime-focused messaging.

The Canadian’s detention has prompted concern from family members, who argue that his legal and personal circumstances, including past minor convictions and a long-ago criminal history, were misunderstood and that he was treated as though he posed a significant threat.

South Texas Detention Facility. Photo: wikipedia.org

They say separation from his family has been prolonged and stressful, and are pursuing legal avenues to secure his release.

ICE did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the specifics of his case or clarify its rationale for continued detention, but the situation highlights broader debates about U.S. immigration enforcement.

Under U.S. law, immigration authorities can detain and remove non-citizens with certain criminal records, including misdemeanour convictions or nonviolent offences, and some legal experts say many travellers do not fully understand how immigration law differs from criminal law in its consequences.

The man’s family has said they are working with lawyers and advocacy groups to challenge the detention and raise awareness about what they describe as a lack of transparency in ICE’s enforcement practices.

They hope the case will prompt broader review of how detention criteria are applied, especially for foreign nationals with limited or dated criminal history.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.