September 25, 2026 05:44 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation | Opposition readies fresh impeachment push against Gyanesh Kumar over SIR report | ‘Resign in 48 hours or face nationwide agitation’: CJP’s ultimatum to Gyanesh Kumar over SIR row | IIT Bombay student’s parents begin hunger strike, demand arrest of officials | Nandigram bypoll shock: Calcutta HC shields Congress candidate Milan Pradhan in 2007 case, but will he walk free? | ‘I don’t care if you die’: Driver’s chilling response before Noida bus went up in flames | Contempt case against CEC Gyanesh Kumar? Supreme Court advocate seeks AG's consent | Days after Jamui outrage, another girl sexually harassed in Bihar; 4 arrested | 9 burnt to death as sleeper bus carrying 35 catches fire on Noida highway | ‘Gyanesh, it’s done bro!’: CJP turns up heat on CEC after explosive SIR report
Trump announced 'reciprocal' tariffs on imports from many countries in April 2025. Photo: X/The White House.

'Disaster for US workers': Donald Trump slams Supreme Court ruling striking down his tariffs

| @indiablooms | Feb 20, 2026, at 11:28 pm

US President Donald Trump strongly criticized the Supreme Court on Friday after the justices struck down his sweeping tariffs, calling the ruling “outrageous” and a setback for American economic security.

The 6-3 decision, authored by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, held that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The Court emphasized that only Congress has the constitutional power to levy taxes and tariffs, noting that IEEPA was intended for national emergencies, not routine trade policy.

Trump, speaking to reporters, described the ruling as “a disaster for US workers” and insisted that his tariffs were vital to addressing trade deficits and protecting American industries.

He also suggested that his administration may explore alternative ways to implement tariffs despite the setback.

The Supreme Court’s three liberal justices joined three conservatives in the majority, while Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito dissented.

Trump’s tariffs had already generated more than $133 billion in revenue for the Treasury, with potential long-term economic costs estimated at $3 trillion over the next decade, media reports said.

Companies such as Costco have already lined up in court to seek refunds, highlighting the immediate legal and financial consequences of the ruling.

Analysts say the decision underscores the limits of presidential authority in economic policy and reinforces Congress’s exclusive role in taxation and trade legislation.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.