September 26, 2026 08:49 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death | 'Rahul Gandhi is devoid of wisdom and knowledge': BJP hits back over 'vote theft' claim | ‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation | Opposition readies fresh impeachment push against Gyanesh Kumar over SIR report | ‘Resign in 48 hours or face nationwide agitation’: CJP’s ultimatum to Gyanesh Kumar over SIR row | IIT Bombay student’s parents begin hunger strike, demand arrest of officials
Mahua Moitra. Photo: Official Facebook.

'Why don't you sit together and sort it out?' Delhi HC tells Mahua Moitra, advocate Jai Dehadrai over dog custody

| @indiablooms | Sep 03, 2025, at 10:59 pm

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked why Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra and advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai are unable to "sit together" and resolve their battle over the custody of a pet dog, which erupted following allegations of parliamentary impropriety and corruption against the politician.

 

"Why don't you sit together and sort it out? What relief is she seeking in the suit?" Justice Jain asked, referring to Moitra's petition seeking shared custody of the dog, a Rottweiler named Henry.

The Trinamool MP and Dehadrai, a Supreme Court lawyer, were reportedly in a relationship and have not been on good terms ever since they parted ways.

The two have now accused each other of "stealing" Henry and have been engaged in a legal battle since 2023.

Moitra said Henry belongs to her and has sought joint custody of the dog.

Meanwhile, Dehadrai has challenged a trial court order that restrains him from publicising the custody battle with Moitra.

Appearing on behalf of Dehadrai, advocate Sanjay Ghose said he was upset with the trial court's order restricting both from publicly speaking about the case. He said the order, which was passed on a suit by Moitra, violated his freedom of speech.

He also said he had earlier made a post on X without mentioning the details of the case, but it was later termed a violation of the court order.

"A frivolous case is filed against me, and I can't talk about it, I can't discuss it, I can't write about it? Where is it necessary for the fairness of the trial? She is an MP. Can an MP claim a higher right over a normal plaintiff?" Ghose said.

The High Court on Wednesday sought a response from the Trinamool MP on the matter and posted the same for hearing in December.

Dehadrai has repeatedly claimed that Henry was with him ever since he was 40 days old. He also said he brought the dog, making him his real guardian.

A complaint by Dehadrai in 2023, whom Moitra had referred to as a "jilted ex", led the Lok Sabha Ethics Committee to recommend the latter's expulsion from Parliament for allegedly accepting "illegal gratifications" from a businessman to raise questions in Parliament at his behest.

Moitra had denied the charge of receiving any pecuniary benefit. She termed the Lok Sabha panel recommendation a "pre-fixed match by a kangaroo court".

In September 2023, Moitra reportedly filed a police case against Dehadrai and sent senior officers to his house to get him to sign a custody agreement for Henry, which he refused.

In a complaint with Delhi Police in November that year, Dehadrai alleged that the Trinamool MP was using his pet as an "excuse to come personally" to his residence in an attempt to intimidate him.

He also accused her of "trespassing", "criminal intimidation" and "breach of peace" at his residence.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.