September 27, 2026 02:45 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained | 'Terrorism by Pakistan will have consequences': India issues blunt warning at UNGA | Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death | 'Rahul Gandhi is devoid of wisdom and knowledge': BJP hits back over 'vote theft' claim | ‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation
Photo: Sadhvi Pragya Thakur/ X

'Was forced to name PM Modi': Pragya Thakur alleges torture, coercion in custody after Malegaon blast acquittal; blames Congress for ‘conspiracy’

| @indiablooms | Aug 02, 2025, at 09:02 pm

New Delhi: Days after a special NIA court acquitted all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, including her, former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur made explosive allegations, claiming she was tortured and coerced into naming Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, and others during the investigation, according to media reports.

"I have given everything in writing and named all those whom I was forced to name. They kept saying, ‘Name these people then we won’t beat you.’ Their main aim was to torture me," she said, reported India Today.

Thakur accused the then UPA government of fabricating the case to malign saffron groups and the armed forces.

“The Congress filed this false case as part of their conspiracy. It had no basis. Congress is anti-religion. It is a party that feeds terrorists. Congress can never become a nationalist party,” she said, calling the verdict a “victory for Dharma.”

She further alleged that she was denied adequate medical attention during custody.

“I wasn’t given proper medical care — only enough to somehow keep me going. That is why I am in this condition today. I have become completely weak from within,” she said, according to the India Today report.

On Thursday, the special NIA court in Mumbai acquitted all accused, including Thakur and Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit, saying the prosecution had failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.

Special Judge A.K. Lahoti observed that suspicion alone could not be the basis for conviction.

In a related development, former Maharashtra ATS officer Mehboob Mujawar told India Today TV that his superior, then ATS officer Param Bir Singh, had instructed him to arrest RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat to bolster the narrative of ‘saffron terror’.

"I was directed by Param Bir Singh, and those above him asked me to arrest these individuals -- Ram Kalsangra, Sandip Dange, Dilip Patidar, and RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat. It was beyond my capacity to arrest someone like Mohan Bhagwat, who holds significant influence in Maharashtra," Mujawar was quoted as saying by India Today.

Initially, the Maharashtra ATS had attributed the Malegaon blasts to SIMI (Students Islamic Movement of India).

In 2011, the case was handed over to the NIA, which in 2013 filed a joint chargesheet with the ATS, naming eight alleged members of the Abhinav Bharat group.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.