May 05, 2026 09:26 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Jolt to TMC! Supreme Court rejects plea challenging central staff deployment at Bengal counting centres | Bangladesh MP warns of refugee crisis if BJP wins West Bengal polls | Diplomatic row: Bangladesh summons Indian envoy over Himanta Biswa Sarma remarks | Supreme Court grants Pawan Khera anticipatory bail in case over allegations against Himanta Biswa Sarma's wife | ‘Not necessary to humiliate me with arrest’: Pawan Khera to SC over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife | ‘Let’s not choose for people capable of choosing’: Supreme Court to Centre on teen pregnancy termination | I-PAC co-founder Vinesh Chandel gets bail after Bengal polls conclude | Exit Polls Give Bengal to BJP—But One Survey Begs to Differ | Big defence push: Rajnath Singh to hold high-stakes talks with Italy’s Defence Minister | “Voting without fear”: PM Modi hails record turnout in West Bengal polls

Tripura CM reacts to his Mizoram counterpart's letter requesting to reconsider Bru settlement

| @indiablooms | May 31, 2020, at 02:49 pm

Agartala/UNI: Tripura government has remained unmoved on its decision to settle 34,000 displaced Bru people of Mizoram in the state despite continuing tension and series of demonstrations by different organisations, including non-Bru tribal residents of the surrounding Kanchanpur in North Tripura.

Organisations like Nagarik Suraksha Manch (NSM), Jampui Mizo Convention (JMC) and Young Mizo Association (YMA) have resorted to agitation opposing the Bru-rehabilitation plan of the Tripura government.

There have been large scale protests in various locations of North Tripura disrict, Dhalai and Unokoti districts when the administration went their to demarcate the land for settling the Brus.



Meanwhile, Mizoram Chief Minister Zoramthanga wrote to his Tripura counterpart requesting him to reconsider the plan of rehabilitating the displaced Brus in Mizo dominated Jampui hills of North Tripura, which has already triggered agitation in the bordering locations of Tripura and Mizoram.


Reacting to Zoramthanga’s request, Tripura CM Biplab Kumar Deb said, “Anybody can write a letter and request, but the decision is taken by the government of the state where the issue has arisen, taking a holistic view of the situation. The Bru settlement was a long pending issue and finally, it was resolved after a detailed discussion under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.”

Deb however, reiterated that displaced Brus will be settled in the state very soon and the state government has already decided the places for settlement and all steps have been taken for an amicable solution to the problem.


A decision was taken to repatriate Bru families with a convincing package of rehabilitation to three districts of Western and Northern parts of Mizoram but Brus did not agree with the plan and  demanded cluster-based rehabilitation of their choice and a separate autonomous district council (ADC) for Brus, which was not acceptable to Mizoram government.
 

Finally, Tripura government in a quadruplet agreement in January this year announced to settle them in 20 locations in different districts of the state and identified about 5500 acres of land.

The civil society organisation under the banner of NSM has launched a movement against the decision of Tripura government apprehending inter-community clashes and sudden increase of tribal population.

Meanwhile, Mizoram CM Zoramthanga requested Deb to immediately reconsider the move and cancel the proposal of re-settlement of displaced Brus in Mizo dominated Jampui Hills and surrounding areas in North Tripura. And, there has been ethnic tension and upheaval between Mizos and Brus, both in Mizoram and Tripura.

“Any strain between the two communities in Tripura will no doubt have repercussions in Mizoram and vice versa, which could defeat the very purpose and spirit of the agreement signed,” Zoramthanga apprehended in the letter.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.