August 03, 2026 09:51 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Kulgam terror attack turns deadlier: Second Chhattisgarh worker succumbs to bullet injuries | 'I'm ashamed': Girl who abused PM Modi during NEET protests issues apology | 'Abuses never solve anything': PM Modi urges forgiveness after Jantar Mantar protest slogans | 'Country wanted an apology, PM forgave it': Congress' sharp swipe at Modi's video over 'abuse' row | Bengal STF arrests JeM suspect from Burdwan; probe underway into 'plot' targeting CM Suvendu Adhikari | 'My father was almost lynched': Families of Delhi cops assaulted during NEET protests share chilling accounts | Nine killed after 'dangerous' building collapses in Maharashtra | Shehzad Poonawalla quits BJP, drops party name from X bio—big political twist | Meta India head Arun Srinivas booked over alleged anti-Modi posts during NEET protests | 'I received threats to join BJP': CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke's explosive allegation sparks fresh political row

Supreme Court to hear review petitions filed in Rafale case asap

| @indiablooms | Feb 21, 2019, at 01:08 pm

New Delhi, Feb 21 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Thursday said it will hear as soon as possible the review petitions filed in the Rafale case filed by several people.

"We will hear as soon as possible the review petitions filed in the case filed by many in the Rafale matter," the court said.

Senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan on Thursday mentioned before the top court and requested it to hear the petition seeking review of its verdict on Rafale deal.

To this, the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi said he will do something for the listing of the case as special bench is to be constituted for it.

Bhushan in his petition stated that several facts have come to light after the judgement was reserved in the matter last year, and the SC should hear the case and the judgement must be recalled.

Bhushan sought that an oral hearing in the open court to the petitioners’ should be assigned as the facts and circumstances of the case sufficiently necessitate, he said in his review petition. 

Image: UNI

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.