August 03, 2026 03:23 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Kulgam terror attack turns deadlier: Second Chhattisgarh worker succumbs to bullet injuries | 'I'm ashamed': Girl who abused PM Modi during NEET protests issues apology | 'Abuses never solve anything': PM Modi urges forgiveness after Jantar Mantar protest slogans | 'Country wanted an apology, PM forgave it': Congress' sharp swipe at Modi's video over 'abuse' row | Bengal STF arrests JeM suspect from Burdwan; probe underway into 'plot' targeting CM Suvendu Adhikari | 'My father was almost lynched': Families of Delhi cops assaulted during NEET protests share chilling accounts | Nine killed after 'dangerous' building collapses in Maharashtra | Shehzad Poonawalla quits BJP, drops party name from X bio—big political twist | Meta India head Arun Srinivas booked over alleged anti-Modi posts during NEET protests | 'I received threats to join BJP': CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke's explosive allegation sparks fresh political row

Supreme Court refuses to stay parliament's amendments to SC/ST Act

| @indiablooms | Jan 25, 2019, at 02:29 pm

New Delhi, Jan 25 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to stay amendments, which were passed by the parliament last year, to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act which diluted the provision of an anticipatory bail for a person who committed atrocities against the community, media reports said.

The amendment, which was passed in August last year, overturned a Supreme Court's order which had ruled public servants cannot be detained after a complaint filed against them.

The top court said it will hear the Centre's petition against its March 20, 2018 order and pleas filed against the parliament's amendments together.

In April 2018, at least 11 people died and hundreds were arrested during the protests against the apex court's order.

After the amendments, no preliminary inquiry will now be required to lodge a case against an accused who can be arrested without any approval.

The petitions claimed that the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, the two houses of the parliament, have arbitrarily amended the law, doing away with the provision which had earlier allowed a person to take an anticipatory bail.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.