May 02, 2026 01:56 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bangladesh MP warns of refugee crisis if BJP wins West Bengal polls | Diplomatic row: Bangladesh summons Indian envoy over Himanta Biswa Sarma remarks | Supreme Court grants Pawan Khera anticipatory bail in case over allegations against Himanta Biswa Sarma's wife | ‘Not necessary to humiliate me with arrest’: Pawan Khera to SC over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife | ‘Let’s not choose for people capable of choosing’: Supreme Court to Centre on teen pregnancy termination | I-PAC co-founder Vinesh Chandel gets bail after Bengal polls conclude | Exit Polls Give Bengal to BJP—But One Survey Begs to Differ | Big defence push: Rajnath Singh to hold high-stakes talks with Italy’s Defence Minister | “Voting without fear”: PM Modi hails record turnout in West Bengal polls | Mamata Banerjee trying to intimidate Hindu voters, alleges Suvendu Adhikari in Bhabanipur
Amish Devgan

Supreme Court refuses to cancel FIRs against TV anchor Amish Devgan for Sufi saint remark

| @indiablooms | Dec 07, 2020, at 10:11 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to quash multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) filed against television anchor Amish Devgan for allegedly hurting religious sentiments with his remarks against a Sufi saint.

The Apex Court bench comprising Justices A M Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna asserted that the journalist will get protection from any coercive action if he continues to cooperate with the probe.

The top court clubbed and transferred all the seven FIRs filed against Amish Devgan in different states, including Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and Telangana, to Ajmer in Rajasthan.

Several police complaints and FIRs have been registered against Devgan across the country after he described the Sufi saint Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti as “attacker” and “lootera” (robber) during a debate he hosted on his show ‘Aar Par’ on June 15.

The show was debating public interest litigations (PILs) regarding the Place of Worship Special Provision Act.

Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra, appearing for Devgan, had submitted that there was no "incitement of hate" or any attempt to "instigate a particular community against the other."

Devgan had already apologised for his remarks, terming as "inadvertent error."

"In 1 of my debates, I inadvertently referred to ‘Khilji’ as Chishti. I sincerely apologise for this grave error and the anguish it may have caused to followers of the Sufi saint Moinuddin Chisthi, whom I revere. I have in the past sought blessings at his dargah. I regret this error," he had said in a tweet.  

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.