September 26, 2026 05:53 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death | 'Rahul Gandhi is devoid of wisdom and knowledge': BJP hits back over 'vote theft' claim | ‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation | Opposition readies fresh impeachment push against Gyanesh Kumar over SIR report | ‘Resign in 48 hours or face nationwide agitation’: CJP’s ultimatum to Gyanesh Kumar over SIR row | IIT Bombay student’s parents begin hunger strike, demand arrest of officials
Shilpa Shetty with Raj Kundra. Photo: Official Facebook.

Shilpa Shetty withdraws petition to travel abroad in ₹60-crore fraud probe

| @indiablooms | Oct 16, 2025, at 10:29 pm

Actor Shilpa Shetty has withdrawn her interim plea seeking permission to travel abroad amid an ongoing ₹60-crore fraud investigation involving her and her husband, businessman Raj Kundra, the Bombay High Court was informed on Thursday, media reports said.

The decision followed the court's expression of reservations about granting the couple permission to leave the country.

Advocate Niranjan Mundargi, appearing for Shetty, told a bench of Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad that the proposed trip to the United States, reportedly for a “professional commitment” linked to an international video collaboration, had “not materialised.”

“The applicant is not intending to travel as of now and seeks liberty to withdraw,” Mundargi said, adding that Shetty reserved the right to file a fresh application if necessary in the future.

During the hearing, complainant’s counsel Yusuf Iqbal objected to an affidavit dated October 14 filed by Shetty, claiming it was “not notarised in accordance with law” and that she had not signed it before the notary.

Mundargi said he had “no instructions” on the notarisation issue but reiterated that Shetty was withdrawing her travel request.

The main writ petition challenging the Look Out Circular (LOC) issued against Shetty and Kundra will be heard next on November 17.

The case stems from a complaint by businessman Deepak Kothari, who alleged that he was induced to invest ₹60 crore in Best Deal TV Pvt Ltd, a company linked to Shetty and Kundra, and that the funds were diverted for personal use.

Earlier this month, the High Court refused to allow the couple to travel to Phuket, noting that they had failed to provide credible documents to justify the trip and that the investigation in the case was still underway.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.