September 28, 2026 02:00 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained | 'Terrorism by Pakistan will have consequences': India issues blunt warning at UNGA | Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death | 'Rahul Gandhi is devoid of wisdom and knowledge': BJP hits back over 'vote theft' claim | ‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation
EmeraldCourtProject

SC orders demolition of 40-storeyed towers; slams Noida Authority for colluding with realty firm in illegal construction

| @indiablooms | Aug 31, 2021, at 11:32 pm

Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court Tuesday ordered realty firm Supertech to pull down the 40-storeyed twin towers in its Emerald Court Project in Noida over grave violation of building rules, according to media reports.

The order was issued by a bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud upholding the 2014 judgment of the Allahabad High Court and directed Supertech to raze the buildings at its own cost within the next three months, according to Hindustan Times report.

The court also asked the firm to refund money to the home buyers within two months and pay Rs 2 crore to the Resident's Welfare Association that fought the case against the illegal construction, it said.

The SC slammed the Noida Authority for colluding with the builder, allowing the construction of the towers in clear violation of municipal and safety norms. The petitioners also alleged that the project also flouted the minimum distance criteria.

On April 11, 2014, the Allahabad High Court had ordered the company to demolish the twin towers within four months and refund money to the people who had purchased apartments in the buildings.

The order was stayed by the Supreme Court after Supertech appealed against the decision.

On August 4 last, the top court reserved its order and reprimanded the authority for its "shocking exercise of power" in sanctioning the two residential towers in a green area and then blocking the Right to Information request from home buyers about the building plans.

According to the HT report, castigating the Authority for blaming the home buyers for asking the plan too late, the apex court said "From the way you are arguing it appears that you are the promoter. You cannot be fighting against the home buyers. As a public authority, you have to take a neutral stand. Your conduct reeks of corruption from the eyes, ears, and nose and you are trying to find fault with the homebuyers."

The court pointed out that the Authority wrote to Supertech asking whether to give the plan to the home buyers association and it was only after the High Court expressly directed the authority to give the plan that it did so.

The association accused the firm of not showing the towers in the original plan and the current construction blocked their view, fresh air, and sunlight

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.