August 04, 2026 10:17 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'It was a conspiracy': Brij Bhushan reacts after acquittal in wrestlers' sexual harassment case | After NEET protests, CJP backs Jharkhand students' agitation over alleged JPSC-JSSC exam irregularities | Brij Bhushan acquitted: Delhi Court clears ex-WFI chief in high-profile wrestlers' sexual harassment case | India finishes 4th at Commonwealth Games 2026 with 39 medals despite missing medal-rich sports | Kulgam terror attack turns deadlier: Second Chhattisgarh worker succumbs to bullet injuries | 'I'm ashamed': Girl who abused PM Modi during NEET protests issues apology | 'Abuses never solve anything': PM Modi urges forgiveness after Jantar Mantar protest slogans | 'Country wanted an apology, PM forgave it': Congress' sharp swipe at Modi's video over 'abuse' row | Bengal STF arrests JeM suspect from Burdwan; probe underway into 'plot' targeting CM Suvendu Adhikari | 'My father was almost lynched': Families of Delhi cops assaulted during NEET protests share chilling accounts

Sabarimala case: Petition filed against Supreme Court's verdict allowing women's entry into temple

| @indiablooms | Oct 08, 2018, at 12:08 pm

New Delhi, Oct 8 (IBNS): A petition has been filed against the Supreme Court's verdict which allowed women of all ages to enter Kerala's Sabarimala Temple, where female persons of child bearing age had no access earlier, media reports said.

The top court had passed the verdict as it was hearing a clutch of petitions that have been challenging the ban on the entry of women, who are aged between 10 to 50 years, in Sabarimala Temple, dedicated to Lord Ayyappa. 

The petition against the top court's verdict has been filed by President of the National Ayyappa Devotees Association, NDTV reported.

The five-judge bench, headed by former Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, passed the judgement in favour of women with a 4:1 ratio. The only judge who had dissented, interestingly a woman, was Justice Indu Malhotra.

The former CJI was quoted by NDTV as saying, "Religion is for one dignity with identity. Right to practice religion available to men and women."

"Rules based on biological characteristics will not muster constitution," Justice Misra said asserting equality among men and women.

He also said, "Religion can't be a cover to deny rights."

On the contrary, Justice Malhotra said court should not interfere in religious matters.

The constitution protects religious practices, she said.

Several women activists have opposed the ban on the entry of women inside the temple.

Earlier in January this year, the Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB), which manages the Sabarimala Temple, had decided to make proof-of-age documents mandatory for female devotees at the shrine.

Sabarimala is a Hindu pilgrimage centre at the Periyar Tiger Reserve in the Western Ghat mountain ranges of Pathanamthitta District and witnesses one of the largest annual pilgrimages in the world with an estimated 45–50 million devotees visiting every year.

Lord Ayyappa's temple is situated amidst 18 hills on a hilltop.

Meanwhile, the Kerala government had said it would not challenged the Supreme Court's verdict.

Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan had said the state government will ensure protection and facilities for all women who will enter the temple.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.