September 29, 2026 05:28 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Vijay's TVK makes Bengal entry: First party office opens in Purba Bardhaman amid state's political shake-up | SRFTI clash erupts over ABGP event: Students allege assault; BJP calls it ‘ugly face of Leftists’ | 'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained | 'Terrorism by Pakistan will have consequences': India issues blunt warning at UNGA | Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death
In images videograbs of Rajnath Singh & Rahul Gandhi speaking in LS from X

Rajnath Singh refutes Rahul Gandhi's Agnipath scheme claim in bitter Lok Sabha face off

| @indiablooms | Jul 30, 2024, at 05:50 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Centre's Agnipath scheme, which received massive flak from the Opposition, was once again at the heart of a heated debate between Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and Union Minister Rajnath Singh Monday.

The Defence Minister accused Gandhi of disseminating false information and misleading the people on the same and offered to discuss the issue in the House.

In his speech on the Budget presented by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, Gandhi claimed that the Agnipath scheme has robbed the country's soldiers and their families of financial security and respect, pointing to the absence of pensions.

He alleged that the scheme exposes the government's "anti-youth and anti-farmer" leanings.

Singh said that Gandhi had propagated several misconceptions about the Budget, which Finance Minister Sitharaman would clarify in her upcoming speech.

He said the Leader of the Opposition was misleading the public regarding Agnipath.

On July 1, a similar heated exchange had unfolded in the Lok Sabha between Gandhi and Rajnath Singh.

"One Agniveer lost his life in a landmine blast, but he is not recognised as a 'martyr'. I consider him a martyr, but the government of India does not. PM Modi does not call him a martyr -- he refers to him as an Agniveer. His family will not receive pension or compensation. The Agnipath scheme treats them as expendable, like a labourer," Gandhi had said, setting off massive protests from the BJP members.

To this, Singh contended that the Congress leader was misleading the House and clarified that the families of Agniveers who die in the line of duty receive financial assistance of Rs. 1 crore.

"He (Rahul Gandhi) should not mislead the House with incorrect statements. Financial aid of ₹ 1 crore is provided to the family of an Agniveer who sacrifices his life while defending our borders or during wartime," Singh had asserted.

Rahul Gandhi later cited the case of Agniveer Ajay Kumar who died in the line of duty and posted a video of his father claiming the family had not received any money from the central government and demanded facilities as well as pension. 

Ajay Kumar's family later clarified that they had received some compensation but demanded hero status for him.

"We want the Agniveer scheme to be scrapped and we should get pension and canteen card," his father told NDTV.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.