April 04, 2026 05:26 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
AAP drops Raghav Chadha from key parliamentary role, sparks buzz over internal rift | Amit Shah to camp in West Bengal for 15 days during Assembly polls; predicts Mamata’s defeat in state and Bhabanipur | 'BJP plotting President’s Rule, don’t fall in the trap': Mamata Banerjee on Malda unrest, urges peace | 'Most polarised state': CJI Kant raps Bengal govt over 9-hour hostage of judicial officers | Bengal SIR protest: Judge pleads for help amid mob attack after 9-hour hostage ordeal | Bengal SIR progress: 47 lakh of 60 lakh adjudicated cases disposed of, Supreme Court informed | Amit Shah to join Suvendu Adhikari on Bhabanipur nomination day; BJP plans mega roadshow | Fuel prices rise: Premium petrol, diesel hiked amid oil price surge | Commercial LPG up Rs 195.50 as global oil prices rise; domestic rates unchanged | Layoff alert: Oracle cuts 30,000 jobs globally, 12,000 hit in India
Parliament
PM Modi inspecting new Parliament building | Image Credit: UNI

PIL in SC seeking direction to have new parliament building inaugurated by President Droupadi Murmu and not PM Modi

| @indiablooms | May 25, 2023, at 09:58 pm

New Delhi: A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a direction that the new parliament building should be inaugurated by the President of India, and not by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The petitioner, a practicing lawyer C R Jaya Sukin, filed the petition in the top court and said that the Lok Sabha secretariat violated the Constitution by not inviting the President for the inauguration.

"The statement by the Lok Sabha Secretariat on May 18 and invites issued by the Secretary General, Lok Sabha, for the inauguration of the new parliament building, have been done in an arbitrary manner without proper perusal of the records and without proper application of mind," petitioner Sukin claimed in his plea.

Sukin said that the matter is likely to come up for hearing in the Supreme Court very soon.

The petitioner stated that the respondents—the Central government and the Lok Sabha Secretariat—have violated the Indian Constitution and shown disrespect to it.

"The parliament is the supreme legislative body of India. The Indian Parliament comprises of the President and the two Houses - Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and Lok Sabha (House of the People). The President has the power to summon and prorogue either House of Parliament or to dissolve Lok Sabha," the petitioner stated.

(With UNI inputs)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.