September 28, 2026 05:44 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Vijay's TVK makes Bengal entry: First party office opens in Purba Bardhaman amid state's political shake-up | SRFTI clash erupts over ABGP event: Students allege assault; BJP calls it ‘ugly face of Leftists’ | 'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained | 'Terrorism by Pakistan will have consequences': India issues blunt warning at UNGA | Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death
Private Property
Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

Not all private properties are community resources that govt can take over: Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Nov 05, 2024, at 05:32 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: In a landmark judgement, the Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled not all private properties can be considered community resources that the government can take over, media reports said.

A nine-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud delivered the verdict with 8:1 majority. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia dissented.

The top court held that some private properties come under Article 39(b) as they are material and belong to the community.

CJI Chandrachud pronounced the majority verdict as quoted by Live Law, "The phrase may include privately owned resources....Not every resource owned by an individual can be considered a material resource of the community merely because it meets the qualifier of material needs."

The court said whether a resource can be considered as" material resource of community" should be based on its nature, characteristics and the impact on the community.

The case is related to Article 31C of the Constitution that protects laws that ensure the distribution of the community's resources to serve the common good, and prevents the concentration of wealth and the means of production.

Article 39B states that the State shall make its policy to ensure that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are distributed so that the common good is subserved.

CJI Chandrachud added, as quoted by NDTV, "Does material resources of a community used in 39B include privately owned resources? Theoretically, the answer is yes, the phrase may include privately owned resources. However, this court is unable to subscribe itself to the minority view of Justice Iyer in Ranganath Reddy."

"We hold that not every resource owned by an individual can be considered a material resource of a community only because it meets the qualifier of material needs," he added.

The Supreme Court said Justice Krishna Iyer's 1978 ruling is "unsustainable". 

Justice Iyer's ruling advanced socialist economic ideology and so it is unsustainable. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.