May 03, 2026 07:59 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Jolt to TMC! Supreme Court rejects plea challenging central staff deployment at Bengal counting centres | Bangladesh MP warns of refugee crisis if BJP wins West Bengal polls | Diplomatic row: Bangladesh summons Indian envoy over Himanta Biswa Sarma remarks | Supreme Court grants Pawan Khera anticipatory bail in case over allegations against Himanta Biswa Sarma's wife | ‘Not necessary to humiliate me with arrest’: Pawan Khera to SC over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife | ‘Let’s not choose for people capable of choosing’: Supreme Court to Centre on teen pregnancy termination | I-PAC co-founder Vinesh Chandel gets bail after Bengal polls conclude | Exit Polls Give Bengal to BJP—But One Survey Begs to Differ | Big defence push: Rajnath Singh to hold high-stakes talks with Italy’s Defence Minister | “Voting without fear”: PM Modi hails record turnout in West Bengal polls
Prashant Bhushan

New SC bench to hear 2009 contempt case against Prashant Bhushan on Sept 10

| @indiablooms | Aug 26, 2020, at 01:33 am

New Delhi/UNI: A new bench of the Supreme Court will hear the 2009 contempt case, in which activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan allegedly made remarks calling half of 16 former Chief Justices 'corrupt', on Sept 10.

Apex Court bench, headed by Justice Arun Mishra on Tuesday said that since he is retiring on Sept 2, there is a paucity of time to address the questions which would require a lengthy hearing.

The bench agreed to refer to an appropriate bench the question of conflict between the right to free speech and suo moto contempt powers of the court in the 2009 contempt case against Bhushan, which was initiated for calling past Chief Justices as 'corrupt.'

Justice Mishra said, since Bhushan's counsel, Rajeev Dhavan has raised many questions, there is a paucity of time, otherwise we would have heard the senior counsel with respect to the questions which have been proposed.

"However, since the matter is pending for the last 10 years, as prayed for, we fix the date for Sept 10 before an appropriate Bench as may deem fit by the Chief Justice," the top court asserted.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.