September 28, 2026 03:18 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained | 'Terrorism by Pakistan will have consequences': India issues blunt warning at UNGA | Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death | 'Rahul Gandhi is devoid of wisdom and knowledge': BJP hits back over 'vote theft' claim | ‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation
Waqf Bill
Kiren Rijiju addressing the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. Photo courtesy: Screen-grab from Sansad TV X video

Modi govt saved Parliament building from Waqf takeover: Kiren Rijiju in Lok Sabha

| @indiablooms | Apr 02, 2025, at 01:25 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju on Wednesday said several important public properties including the Parliament building would have been taken over by the Waqf board had the previous Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government continued its rule.

Rijiju said it was Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government, which came in 2014, that actually saved the Parliament building takeover by the Waqf board.

The minister made the remark tabling the contentious Waqf (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha where the Modi government needs the mandatory support of the allies for the passage of any bill.

Rijiju, who is also the Minority Affairs Minister, says, "A case has been going on since 1970 in Delhi. Delhi Waqf board had claimed several properties including CGO Complex, Parliament building. While the matter was subjudice, the then UPA government had handed over the entire land to the Waqf board by notifying."

"If we hadn't brought an amendment bill, 123 properties including this Parliament building would have been claimed by the Waqf board. We have no idea how many properties would have been notified if the Narendra Modi government had not come and UPA continued its rule," he added.

When the Congress protested against the minister's remarks, Rijiju said, "I am speaking on the basis of an official record. This is the reality."

"I believe that those who oppose this bill will also have a change in their hearts. Everyone will support this bill with a positive attitude," he added.

All political parties irrespective of ruling and opposition camps have issued a whip to be present in the House.

Rijiju said the Lok Sabha's Business Advisory Committee comprising representatives from all major political parties agreed on an eight-hour debate.

The committee, which is chaired by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, has agreed that the duration of the debate can be extended as per the sense of the House.

The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which is short of majority in the Lok Sabha, is backed by its crucial allies, Telugu Desam Party (TDP), Janata Dal (United) and Lok Janshakti Party (LJP).

The government is in all probability likely to get its bill sail through the lower house of Parliament with the support of its allies.

On the other hand, the Opposition comprising contradictory allies is aiming to put up a united show having discussed the matter in a meeting on Tuesday.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.