August 10, 2026 01:03 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘A morning I will cherish’: Raghav Chadha meets PM Modi, shares photos from ‘enriching’ meeting | Delhi Mercedes crash kills 70-year-old woman: Cop’s son behind wheel, beer bottle found | Indian-origin woman accused of ‘visa fraud’ on X: US Attorney steps in with major clarification | US Senate passes Russia sanctions bill: India can face Trump’s 100% tariff threat | Expired meat, rotten vegetables found at Bengaluru's luxury hotels, legal action begins | 'I'm ready to be humiliated': Vijay, Udhayanidhi Stalin clash in Tamil Nadu Assembly over Cauvery dispute | 'They don't need Mohan Bhagwat's certificate': Priyanka Gandhi Vadra's sharp reply to RSS chief's Gen Z remark | 'Students, Gen Z, ask me anything': Rahul Gandhi launches Instagram Q&A, responds to Jharkhand protest | PM Modi goes Gen Z, urges Indians to share 'Get Ready With Me' videos on National Handloom Day | Former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal sentenced to 10-year jail term in 2013 rape case as Bombay HC overturns acquittal
Amit Shah (L) & Rahul Gandhi (R) in Lok Sabha. Photo: X/Videograb.

Lok Sabha turns battleground as Amit Shah, Rahul Gandhi trade blows over 'vote chori' claims

| @indiablooms | Dec 10, 2025, at 09:13 pm

Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi clashed sharply in the Lok Sabha during a heated debate on electoral reforms, making for one of the most confrontational exchanges of the season.

The flashpoint came when Rahul Gandhi challenged Shah to hold an open debate on the allegations he had raised in recent press conferences about irregularities in voter lists.

Shah, visibly irritated, pushed back, declaring that no one would dictate the order or content of his speech in Parliament.

During his address, Shah accused the Opposition of repeatedly attacking the integrity of existing electoral rolls, while simultaneously objecting to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR)—a process, he said, meant to update and clean up voter lists.

He mocked the Congress for what he described as selective outrage.

“When you win, the voter list is perfect—you celebrate and take oath. But the moment you suffer a loss, like in Bihar, suddenly the voter list becomes flawed. These double standards won’t work,” he said.

Shah also derided Rahul Gandhi’s series of press conferences on “vote chori,” including the one he termed a “hydrogen bomb.”

He accused the Nehru-Gandhi family of being “generational vote thieves,” sparking loud protests from the Opposition benches.

Rahul Gandhi interrupted, demanding that Shah first explain why Election Commissioners had been given immunity for actions taken while in office. He then challenged the minister to debate the contents of his press conferences one by one.

A visibly agitated Shah responded, saying, "I have been elected for three decades. Parliament will not run on your terms. I will speak in the order I choose. Listen patiently—I will answer everything.”

Gandhi later dismissed Shah’s tone as “defensive and fearful.”

Shah used the moment to launch a pointed historical attack. He claimed the “first instance of vote theft” occurred when Jawaharlal Nehru became Prime Minister despite Sardar Patel receiving more state unit votes.

He then cited the Allahabad High Court verdict that invalidated Indira Gandhi’s Raebareli win, calling it a “big vote chori,” and accused her of changing laws and superseding senior judges to shield herself.

Turning to Sonia Gandhi, Shah referred to an old allegation that she voted before gaining citizenship—prompting immediate objections from Congress MPs, who called it baseless.

Moving back to current issues, Shah defended EVMs and the SIR process, accusing the Opposition of wanting to retain illegal immigrants on voter rolls. This remark triggered a coordinated Opposition walkout.

Outside Parliament, Rahul Gandhi said the Home Minister had evaded every substantive question.

“He avoided discussing transparent voter rolls, clarity on EVM architecture, or the evidence I presented. His reply was completely defensive.”

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.