August 09, 2026 06:04 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘A morning I will cherish’: Raghav Chadha meets PM Modi, shares photos from ‘enriching’ meeting | Delhi Mercedes crash kills 70-year-old woman: Cop’s son behind wheel, beer bottle found | Indian-origin woman accused of ‘visa fraud’ on X: US Attorney steps in with major clarification | US Senate passes Russia sanctions bill: India can face Trump’s 100% tariff threat | Expired meat, rotten vegetables found at Bengaluru's luxury hotels, legal action begins | 'I'm ready to be humiliated': Vijay, Udhayanidhi Stalin clash in Tamil Nadu Assembly over Cauvery dispute | 'They don't need Mohan Bhagwat's certificate': Priyanka Gandhi Vadra's sharp reply to RSS chief's Gen Z remark | 'Students, Gen Z, ask me anything': Rahul Gandhi launches Instagram Q&A, responds to Jharkhand protest | PM Modi goes Gen Z, urges Indians to share 'Get Ready With Me' videos on National Handloom Day | Former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal sentenced to 10-year jail term in 2013 rape case as Bombay HC overturns acquittal
Khalistan

Khalistan unmasked: Violence in the name of faith

| @indiablooms | Nov 20, 2024, at 07:52 pm

The Khalistan movement, long mired in controversy and violence, has once again become a topic of heated debate.

Commentator Rohan Kumar Pall recently raised serious concerns about the intent and operation of this movement.

In his analysis, Pall described it as “driven by revenge and violence,” asserting that it bears no connection to the genuine concerns of the Sikh community.

While the Khalistan movement ostensibly seeks the creation of a separate Sikh state, it has strayed far from being merely a struggle for religious identity.

Pall characterized it as a political agenda pushed by a few extremist leaders. Specifically targeting figures such as Jagmeet Singh and Gurpatwant Singh Pannu, he accused them of exploiting the Sikh community’s name to bolster their political clout and secure foreign funding.

He also alleged that Pakistan provides financial and strategic backing to the movement, further revealing its dangerous motives.

The Khalistan movement has frequently been linked to violence.

The 1985 Air India bombing, which claimed 329 innocent lives, remains its most infamous act. Numerous other violent incidents involving Khalistani organizations have been reported both in India and abroad.

Pall argued that this movement not only threatens India’s unity but also aims to sow global instability.

Pall emphasized that the Sikh community is globally recognized for its values of peace, hard work, and religious devotion.

However, extremist leaders have severely tarnished this image.

He stressed the need for addressing the community’s legitimate grievances through peaceful and democratic means.

Instead of resolving Sikh issues, Pall argued, the Khalistan movement has only deepened their complexities.

The movement has also caused international tensions. In countries like Canada, the UK, and the US, Khalistani supporters have leveraged democratic platforms to promote extremist activities, subjecting these nations to criticism and scrutiny.

Pall’s message is clear: it is vital to distinguish between the Khalistan movement and the genuine aspirations of the Sikh community.

Rejecting violence and foreign interference, he called for dialogue and mutual respect as the pathway to resolving underlying issues.

Now is the time to draw a clear line between the legitimate demands of the Sikh community and the violent Khalistan agenda.

The essence of Sikhism lies in peace and hard work, and it must not be held hostage to any political scheme.

(Image and text courtesy: Khalsavox.com)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.