December 05, 2025 05:27 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
In front of Putin, PM Modi makes bold statement on Russia-Ukraine war: ‘India is not neutral, we side with peace!’ | Rupee weakens following RBI repo rate cut | RBI slashes repo rate by 25 basis points — big relief coming for borrowers! | 'Mamata fooled Muslims': Humayun Kabir explodes after TMC suspends him over 'Babri Masjid-style mosque' demand; announces new party | Mosque in the middle of Kolkata airport? Centre confirms flight risks, BJP fires at Mamata | Sam Altman is betting big on India! OpenAI in advanced talks with Tata to build AI infrastructure | Government removes mandatory pre-installation of Sanchar Saathi App. Know all details | Calcutta HC overturns controversial Bengal job annulment — 32,000 teachers rejoice! | Bengal SIR shock: 1 lakh ‘deceased voters’ found in Kolkata North! | Massive twist in Bengal voter list: ‘Perfect’ 2,280 booths shrink to just 480 after probe!
Arafaz Ahmas Daing said his house was demolished as a punishment for his reporting. Photo: X/Videograb.

Journalist’s house demolished in Jammu, sparks political outcry and allegations of targeting

| @indiablooms | Nov 29, 2025, at 12:44 am

A major political row has erupted in Jammu after the home of journalist Arafaz Ahmad Daing was demolished in a JDA-led anti-encroachment drive, a move Daing claims was meant to punish him for his reporting, including stories on cross-border drug trafficking, media reports said.

The house, which Daing says was built by his father 40 years ago, was torn down in the presence of a heavy police contingent.

Officials from the Jammu Development Authority (JDA) maintain that the structure stood illegally on government land. Daing, however, argues he had moved into the home only after his own residence was demolished last year.

Daing, who runs a news portal, was also arrested in 2022 for reporting on protests against another demolition drive — a detail now resurfacing as questions grow around the latest action.

Footage showing Daing being whisked away by police even as bulldozers razed the house went viral, triggering sharp political reactions.

Chief Minister Omar Abdullah called the demolition a deliberate attempt to “defame and discredit” the elected government, alleging that officials appointed by the Lieutenant Governor had acted without approval.

“No one supports encroachment,” Abdullah said, “but the JDA cannot adopt a pick-and-choose approach. A particular community is being targeted. Was this the only encroachment in Jammu?”

He has demanded a full list of encroachments from the JDA.

Former J&K BJP chief Ravinder Raina also condemned the demolition, terming it “selective” and extending support to the affected residents.

He distanced the Lieutenant Governor’s office from the action. “The LG has not used the bulldozer. He said no such orders were issued. Where did the order come from?” Raina asked.

Amid the political storm, a moment of solidarity emerged when Kuldeep Sharma, a Hindu neighbour of Daing, gifted him a five-marla plot, offering to help rebuild his home.

“I will not let my brother down,” Sharma said. “If they destroyed his house on three marlas, I am giving him five. Whatever it takes, we will rebuild.”

Sharma also criticised the Chief Minister, saying Abdullah must prevent such incidents if he intends to remain in office.

The Jammu and Kashmir government recently informed the Assembly that over 16,000 kanals of JDA land remain under encroachment across the region.

“The total JDA land under encroachment is 16,212 kanals and two marlas,” the Chief Minister said in a written reply. He added that an additional eight kanals and 16 marlas under Jammu Municipal Corporation jurisdiction were also encroached.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.