Inquiry launched into viral ‘male cadaver’ remark by MBBS student at Pranit More show

The controversy centres on a clip from comedian Pranit More’s show in which Pawar discussed cadavers used in medical education and made remarks about comparing the genitalia of male cadavers.

The video resurfaced amid the broader backlash surrounding another viral clip from More’s show, commonly referred to online as the “Rs 370 biryani” controversy.

KEM dean calls remarks ‘unacceptable’

KEM Hospital Dean Dr Harish Pathak said the institution had constituted a two-member committee to investigate the matter and submit a report for appropriate action.

“Such remarks are completely unacceptable and intolerable,” Dr Pathak said.

“We exercise sensitivity when it comes to talking about dead people since their organs can be donated for medical purposes. We have constituted a two-member committee to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter. Appropriate action will be taken based on the findings of the investigation, expected by evening,” he added.

Hospital officials said the inquiry would examine the content of the viral clip and whether institutional or professional standards were breached.

Viral clip and public backlash

In the circulating video, Pawar is heard discussing bodies used for medical examinations and then joking about comparing the genitalia of dead male patients.

Critics on social media accused her of treating cadavers and body donors disrespectfully.

The clip gained renewed attention while online discussion was already focused on another viral interaction from Pranit More’s show involving an audience member who suggested that spending Rs 370 on a biryani during a date entitled him to something in return.

That remark, made by Gurugram resident Himanshu Jangra, triggered widespread criticism, with many users arguing that paying for a meal does not imply consent.

Jangra later apologised and was reportedly dismissed by his employer after the controversy escalated online.

Student issues public apology

Following the backlash, Pawar posted an apology statement on social media, acknowledging that her comments were insensitive.

“I genuinely want to address a clip from a recent video that has been circulating. Having watched it back, I completely understand why people were upset by what I said. The topic is a sensitive one, and my comments came across in a way they shouldn’t have. While there was never any intention to disrespect anyone, I recognise that impact matters more than intent,” she wrote.

“I’m not here to justify what was said or explain it away. I take responsibility for it. Looking back, I can see how my words could be interpreted differently from what I meant.”

“As a student, this has been a learning experience for me, and it has made me reflect on the way I communicate, especially when discussing subjects that deserve greater thought and sensitivity. To everyone who was disappointed or hurt by the clip, I understand what went wrong, and I am genuinely sorry for that, and I would never let this happen ever again!”

Pawar also removed or altered portions of her social media presence after the video spread widely online.

AIMSA condemns remarks, demands action

The All India Medical Students’ Association (AIMSA) condemned what it described as an “insensitive, irresponsible, and disrespectful portrayal” of cadavers and body donors.

“Every cadaver represents a noble individual who made the selfless decision of body donation for the advancement of medical education and scientific learning. It is because of these donors that generations of medical students are able to learn human anatomy and become doctors dedicated to saving countless lives. Such contributions deserve the highest degree of dignity, gratitude, and respect,” the organisation said in a statement.

AIMSA said the incident raised concerns about medical ethics, professionalism and respect for the deceased and their families.

The organisation called for a public apology and strict institutional action, and urged the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to ensure that content disrespecting body donors and medical ethics is not promoted or widely circulated in the future.

The group also warned that it may pursue legal remedies.