August 09, 2026 07:52 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘A morning I will cherish’: Raghav Chadha meets PM Modi, shares photos from ‘enriching’ meeting | Delhi Mercedes crash kills 70-year-old woman: Cop’s son behind wheel, beer bottle found | Indian-origin woman accused of ‘visa fraud’ on X: US Attorney steps in with major clarification | US Senate passes Russia sanctions bill: India can face Trump’s 100% tariff threat | Expired meat, rotten vegetables found at Bengaluru's luxury hotels, legal action begins | 'I'm ready to be humiliated': Vijay, Udhayanidhi Stalin clash in Tamil Nadu Assembly over Cauvery dispute | 'They don't need Mohan Bhagwat's certificate': Priyanka Gandhi Vadra's sharp reply to RSS chief's Gen Z remark | 'Students, Gen Z, ask me anything': Rahul Gandhi launches Instagram Q&A, responds to Jharkhand protest | PM Modi goes Gen Z, urges Indians to share 'Get Ready With Me' videos on National Handloom Day | Former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal sentenced to 10-year jail term in 2013 rape case as Bombay HC overturns acquittal
Rohingya
A UN Photo of a Rohingya family in 2019 in Cox Bazar after floods / WFP/Nihab Rahman

India and the international community must support Bangladesh in finding homes for Rohingya refugees

| @indiablooms | Aug 09, 2021, at 10:31 pm

Psychologists have identified a condition which affects people who are repeatedly exposed to the suffering of others. They call it compassion fatigue.

When empathy drains away and is replaced by frustration, people often lose their motivation to resolve problems.

Is it possible that compassion fatigue is hardening Bangladesh’s attitude towards the Rohingya refugees?

Some recent reports in the media suggest that the country’s government is planning to hide the Rohingyas away in a remote location, to forget about their plight.

However, my reading of the situation is quite different. I believe that Bangladesh’s leaders remain compassionate. But now that the early emotions of shock have subsided, a new and more sophisticated form of compassion is developing, which includes a fresh approach to problem-solving.

It is very clear to me that any robust plan to help the Rohingyas must receive international support. This has been the theme of top level meetings this summer between representatives of Bangladesh, India and China.

India’s External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar recently reaffirmed his commitment to assisting Bangladesh in the repatriation of the Rohingya refugees to Myanmar, during a meeting in Uzbekistan with Bangladesh’s foreign minister, Abdul Momen.

Mr Momen also discussed the issue with his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, at a conference in Tashkent. The Chinese said they would be prepared to broker talks on the matter between Bangladesh and Myanmar.

When the Rohingya originally flooded across the border into Bangladesh in 2017, following a situation described by the United Nations as a ‘textbook example of ethnic cleansing’, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was praised by the Wall Street Journal as ‘the face of compassion’.

She was clearly moved by the persecution of the Rohingya Muslims at the hands of the Burmese military. It is estimated that more than a million refugees have been given shelter in Cox’s Bazar.

On August 25, 2017, nearly 740,000 Muslim-majority Rohingya fled Rakhine State for Bangladesh. Photo: UNHCR/Roger Arnold 

Yet in a recent speech to a conference on international security in Moscow, Sheikh Hasina insisted that Bangladesh cannot resolve the crisis alone. She also warned that the refugee crisis is creating mountingproblems in the region.

Indian authorities have arrested several Rohingya over the past months for crossing the border without permission. Junior Home Minister Nityanand Rai has told parliament that those entering the country illegally, including the Rohingya, must be considered a "threat to national security".

India is not a signatory to the UN Refugee Convention and rejects a UN position that deporting Rohingya back to Bangladesh places them in danger.

There is also an economic issue. Bangladesh spends an estimated $1.2 billion a year supporting the refugees and costs rise as the population of the camps increases. Some countries have been generous with their help, especially the United States. However, the flow of assistance is decreasing.

In the wake of these challenges, Bangladesh is offering new homes to the Rohingya refugees on an island called Bhasan Char. Some 20,000 people have been relocated thus far, with more to follow.

The Bhasan Char camps are not luxurious. However, nor are they akin to prisons, as some foreign press reports have suggested. The goal is modest: to offer a safe environment, basic education and medical support to the residents until they return to their homeland.

There is a glimmer of hope on the horizon. Myanmar’s so-called government-in-exile has changed its approach from the previous civilian government and indicated that it will now recognise and welcome home the Rohingyas.

However, the problem is that the National Unity Government holds no power. That rests in the hands of the junta, led by military General Min Aung Hlaing. Until the political situation changes, the chances of the Rohingya returning safely to their homes seem desperately remote.

Given the circumstances, I believe the Bangladesh government is doing its best to create a better outcome for the refugees than their present situation. But other countries, including India and China, also need to play their part in creating a sustainable solution.

(Duncan Bartlett is the Editor of Asian Affairs magazine and has reported from Bangladesh for the BBC and other outlets. He is a Research Associate at SOAS, University of London and is currently teaching diplomacy and international relations on the Economist Executive Education course, A New Global Order.  The opinion expressed is of the writer. )

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.