December 06, 2025 10:44 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Centre imposes temporary fare caps as ticket prices defy gravity amid IndiGo meltdown | 'Action is coming': Aviation Minister blames IndiGo for countrywide air travel chaos | In front of Putin, PM Modi makes bold statement on Russia-Ukraine war: ‘India is not neutral, we side with peace!’ | Rupee weakens following RBI repo rate cut | RBI slashes repo rate by 25 basis points — big relief coming for borrowers! | 'Mamata fooled Muslims': Humayun Kabir explodes after TMC suspends him over 'Babri Masjid-style mosque' demand; announces new party | Mosque in the middle of Kolkata airport? Centre confirms flight risks, BJP fires at Mamata | Sam Altman is betting big on India! OpenAI in advanced talks with Tata to build AI infrastructure | Government removes mandatory pre-installation of Sanchar Saathi App. Know all details | Calcutta HC overturns controversial Bengal job annulment — 32,000 teachers rejoice!

Essar tries to use 'leaked' IB report to clamp down on protests: Greenpeace

| | Jun 18, 2014, at 04:41 am
New Delhi, June 17 (IBNS): Non-governmental environmental organization Greenpeace India on Tuesday claimed the Essar Group tried to use ‘leaked’ IB report to clamp down on people’s protests in Mahan forest in Madhya Pradesh.

"The company which has initiated a 500 crore Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) case on tribal people and Greenpeace, to stop them criticising its planned coal mine in Mahan forest, is now trying to use the ‘leaked’ Intelligence Bureau report in the court. At a hearing on the interim gag order on Greenpeace India, the Bombay High Court Judge asked Essar as to how the leaked Intelligence Bureau report is relevant to the case," the NGO said in a statetement.

"Essar is already trying to quash any kind of people’s movement though the SLAPP suit, but is now trying to use the IB report too. The report has no relevance to the case in question, which is about Greenpeace and community criticisms of Essar's behaviour; it appears Essar is trying to use it to tarnish our names in the court through innuendo. This is how the IB report is serving corporate interests, in trying to cast critical voices as illegitimate, and prevent discussion of the real issues,” said Arundhati Muthu, a campaigner with Greenpeace India.

The gag order on Greenpeace and villagers of Mahan came after they carried out a dramatic but peaceful protest at Essar’s Headquarters in Mumbai.

“In contrast, the real issue aren't getting a hearing: people in Mahan have been running from pillar to post trying to lodge an FIR against a forged Gram Sabha, based on which the environment ministry granted the Stage II forest clearance to Mahan. But nothing has been done so far,” said Muthu.

She said: “The SLAPP case should be seen in the same light as last week’s Intelligence Bureau report. The ability of civil society to propose a better future, is a vital part of India’s democracy, and must not be stamped out for the sake of corporate interests. We will continue to fight the SLAPP, and any other attempts to stifle civil society criticism of company's bad behaviour."

The case has been adjourned until June 24.

Arvind Kejriwal's Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on Monday slammed the recent report by the Intelligence Bureau, which alleged that some NGOs in the country are hurting its economic security, and said it was nothing but an 'attempt at criminalising any dissenting voices'.

The IB report had reportedly claimed that  the NGOs and their international donors were planning to target several new economic development projects in the country. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.