September 25, 2026 04:38 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death | 'Rahul Gandhi is devoid of wisdom and knowledge': BJP hits back over 'vote theft' claim | ‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation | Opposition readies fresh impeachment push against Gyanesh Kumar over SIR report | ‘Resign in 48 hours or face nationwide agitation’: CJP’s ultimatum to Gyanesh Kumar over SIR row | IIT Bombay student’s parents begin hunger strike, demand arrest of officials
Supreme Court said mandatory menstrual leave could negatively impact women. Photo: ChatGPT.

‘Employers won’t hire women’: Supreme Court on mandatory menstrual leave plea

| @indiablooms | Mar 13, 2026, at 10:23 pm

Mandatory menstrual leave could negatively impact women’s employment prospects, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said on Friday while hearing a petition seeking directions for states to introduce paid menstrual leave policies.

The Chief Justice warned that making such leave mandatory through legislation could discourage employers from hiring women.

“Creating awareness and sensitisation is different, but the moment you bring in a law mandating menstrual leave, nobody will hire them,” he said during the hearing.

“You don’t know the mindset of employers. They will not hire women if we make such a law.”

The court was hearing a petition filed by lawyer Shailendra Mani Tripathi seeking directions to state governments to frame rules allowing paid leave for women during menstruation, both for students and working professionals.

Chief Justice Surya Kant also said such a law could unintentionally create a perception that women are less capable than men in the workplace.

“It will create a psychological fear or impression among working women that they are ‘less’ than men,” he said.

Justice Joymalya Bagchi, who was part of the bench, also highlighted practical concerns from the perspective of employers.

“Affirmative action in respect of females is constitutionally recognised. But look at the practical reality in the job market. The more unattractive the human resource, the less is the possibility of assumption in the market,” he said.

Senior advocate MR Shamshad, appearing during the hearing, pointed out that the Government of Kerala had introduced menstrual leave for women students in state-run universities in 2013.

The decision was announced by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan as part of the state’s commitment to building a “gender-just society”.

However, Chief Justice Surya Kant said such provisions work when implemented voluntarily but could have unintended consequences if made compulsory through law.

“The moment you say it is compulsory in law, nobody will give them jobs. Nobody will take them in judiciary or government jobs… their career is over,” he said.

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court of India recognised menstrual hygiene as an integral part of a girl child’s right to life, dignity, health and education under Article 21 of the Constitution.

A bench comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan had also directed governments to ensure free sanitary napkins, gender-segregated toilets and menstrual health awareness campaigns.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.