August 17, 2026 03:02 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After SC rebuke, BCI chief apologises to NALSAR students over enrolment freeze row | Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe
ED chief

ED director's extension illegal, must relinquish office by July end: SC

| @indiablooms | Jul 12, 2023, at 06:57 am

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled the extension granted to Enforcement Directorate (ED) director Sanjay Kumar Mishra as illegal and ordered him to step down from the position by July 31.

The apex court said the two orders of the Central government on November 17, 2021 and 2022, extending the Mishra's tenure by one year each were “invalid in law.”

The apex court bench, headed by Justice B R Gavai, passed the order on a batch of petitions, including those filed by Congress leaders Randeep Singh Surjewala and Jaya Thakur and TMC's Mahua Moitra and Saket Gokhale.

The, SC, however, affirmed the amendments in the DSPE and Central Vigilance Commission Act (CVC Act), giving the Centre the power to extend the tenure of a CBI chief and ED director by a possible 3 years beyond their mandatory two-year term.

"We have held scope of judicial review under legislative action is limited if it affects fundamental rights, or is manifestly arbitrary. We have held there is no manifest arbitrariness. The legislature can legislate.. extension can be granted when it is about the high-level officials such as this in the public interest and with reasons in writing," the Supreme Court said.

In December 2022, the Supreme Court sought a reply from the Centre and others to a plea challenging the third extension granted to ED chief Mishra.

It had issued notices to the Union of India, Central Vigilance Commission and the ED director on a plea filed by Congress leader Jaya Thakur.

According to the Congress leader, the Supreme Court had issued a clear directive stating that no additional extensions would be granted to Mishra.

However, the Central government provided Mishra with a second extension, spanning from November 17, 2021, to November 17, 2022.
Subsequently, the leader filed a petition, resulting in the issuance of a notice in response to the matter.

On November 18, Justice SK Kaul recused himself from hearing the petitions that challenged the amended law permitting the extension of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) director's tenure for up to five years.

This occurred a day after Mishra, the chief of the anti-money laundering agency, received a fresh one-year extension.

The batch of petitions, including those filed by Congress leaders Randeep Singh Surjewala and Thakur, as well as TMC's Mahua Moitra and Saket Gokhale, were scheduled for consideration before the bench.

As per an official order, the Union government granted a one-year extension to Mishra, marking the third extension for the Indian Revenue Service officer.

The government notification stated that Mishra, from the 1984 batch of the IRS, would remain in office until November 18, 2023.
Initially appointed as the ED director for two years on November 19, 2018, Mishra's term was retrospectively modified to three years through a government order on November 13, 2020.

Last year, the government enacted an ordinance that allowed for extensions of up to three years for the chiefs of the ED and CBI beyond the mandated two-year term.

On September 5, the Central government challenged the bona fides of the pleas filed by some political leaders in the Supreme Court.
These pleas contested the extension granted to the ED chief and the amended law permitting extensions of up to five years, with the government referring to them as "pressure tactics."

The apex court appointed Vishwanathan as amicus curiae to assist in dealing with the petitions.

Congress leader Surjewala's plea specifically challenged the amendment made by the central government, which deviated from the fundamental concept established by the Supreme Court in the Vineet Narayan and Common Cause cases regarding fixed tenures for such officials.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.