July 07, 2026 01:27 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
China tests ballistic missile from nuclear submarine in Pacific: Australia, New Zealand respond | Baruipur horror: Main accused in alleged rape and murder of minor girl arrested; senior cops dissatisfied with handling of the case | Defence stocks jump after Rs 52,000 crore DAC approval sparks buying frenzy | 'Harry Kane is a great player': Donald Trump after England knocked Mexico out of the World Cup | 'Referee gave a lot against us': Harry Kane reacts after England's dramatic win over Mexico | England hold nerve with 10 men to knock out Mexico in five-goal World Cup classic | 'Why can't citizens protest against the government? They are being made slaves by slapping cases': Bombay HC slams Mumbai Police, quashes activist's externment | 'First he cheats on me...': Siya Goyal's old pub video goes viral amid probe into fiancé Ketan Agarwal's alleged murder | Ronaldo's goal, Ramos' last-gasp winner send Portugal past Croatia, set up Spain clash | India-US trade deal almost done! Piyush Goyal hints at breakthrough
Supreme Court

'Don't lecture judiciary': Supreme Court tells Centre on Abu Salem's plea

| @indiablooms | Apr 22, 2022, at 03:07 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Hearing gangster Abu Salem's petition against his jail sentence exceeding 25 years, the Supreme Court on Thursday slammed the Union Home Ministry over its stance that the plea is premature.

The apex court also objected to the Centre asking it to decide on the case.

"Don't lecture the judiciary. We do not take it kindly when you tell us to decide something which you have to decide," Justice SK Kaul told the Home Ministry.

"The Home Secretary is nobody to tell us to decide the issue," the judge said.

The Supreme Court also said the Centre must be unequivocal in what they want to say.

"We do not like sentences in the Home Ministry affidavit like 'we will take a decision at an appropriate time'," said the judges.

In its affidavit, the Home Ministry had said "it is not the appropriate time" for the government to take a call on Abu Salem's case and that the Supreme Court may decide.

Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundresh were hearing a petition by Abu Salem, a convict in the 1993 Bombay blast case, that India had guaranteed to Portugal courts that his jail sentence cannot exceed 25 years.

On Tuesday, Union Home Secretary Ajay Bhalla told the Supreme Court that the government was bound by the then deputy Prime Minister LK Advani's promise to the Portugal government that any sentence handed out to Abu Salem will not exceed 25 years.

Bhalla said the assurance would come into effect after the 25-year period ended on November 10, 2030.

"It is respectfully submitted that the Government of India is bound by the assurance dated December 17, 2002. The period of 25 years, which is mentioned in the assurance, will be abided by the Union of India at an appropriate time subject to the remedies which may be available," the Home Secretary said.

Abu Salem's claim that India is not complying with the assurance is "premature and based on hypothetical surmises" and can never be raised in present proceedings, Bhalla told the court.

The Supreme Court had earlier said that it is not satisfied with the affidavit filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) which said that the assurance given by India to Portugal is not binding on Indian courts.

On Feb 2, the court had sought a response from the Centre on Abu Salem's plea.

Abu Salem was extradited from Portugal on November 11, 2005, after a drawn-out legal battle.

In 2017, Abu Salem was convicted and sentenced to a life term for his role in the 1993 serial blast case in Mumbai. He was found guilty of transporting weapons from Gujarat to Mumbai ahead of the blasts.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.