January 31, 2026 09:45 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Delhi blast: Probe reveals doctors' module planned attacks on global coffee chain | Begging bowl: Pakistan PM says he feels “ashamed” seeking loans abroad | Epstein Files shocker! Zohran Mamdani’s mother Mira Nair mentioned in latest tranche | Bill Gates contracted STD after sex with Russian women? Epstein Files make explosive, unverified claims | Big setback for Modi govt: Supreme Court stays controversial UGC Equity Regulations 2026 amid student protests | ‘Mother of all deals’: PM Modi says India–EU FTA is for 'ambitious India' | Delhi HC snubs Sameer Wankhede’s defamation plea over Aryan Khan's Netflix series | Maharashtra in shock: Ajit Pawar dies in plane crash — funeral sees emotional gathering of political heavyweights | India, Canada eye 10-year uranium pact during PM Carney’s March visit | 'None will be harassed': Dharmendra Pradhan breaks silence as UGC rules trigger student protests
Image courtesy: wikipedia.org

Disapproval of marriage does not amount to abetment of suicide, rules Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Jan 26, 2025, at 07:47 pm

New Delhi: Disapproving a marriage does not amount to abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Supreme Court has ruled.

A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma made this observation while quashing a chargesheet against a woman accused of abetting the suicide of another woman allegedly in love with her son, PTI reported.

The case stemmed from disputes between the deceased and the appellant's son, who had refused to marry her, according to the report.

The appellant was accused of opposing the marriage and making disparaging remarks against the deceased.

"Even if the appellant expressed her disapproval towards the marriage of Babu Das and the deceased, it does not rise to the level of direct or indirect instigation of abetting suicide," the bench observed, according to the report.

It further stated that a remark such as suggesting the deceased should not live if she cannot marry her lover does not constitute abetment.

"There needs to be a positive act that creates an environment where the deceased is pushed to the edge in order to sustain the charge of section 306, IPC," the bench noted, reported PTI

The court highlighted that the deceased's family had also expressed unhappiness with the relationship, and mere disapproval of a marriage does not satisfy the requirements of instigation necessary to invoke Section 306 IPC.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.