August 17, 2026 02:38 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After SC rebuke, BCI chief apologises to NALSAR students over enrolment freeze row | Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe
Image Credit: UNI

Delhi High Court orders Tarun Tejpal, Tehelka to pay Rs 2 cr to army officer in defamation case

| @indiablooms | Jul 23, 2023, at 04:19 am

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has granted Rs 2 crore to an Indian Army officer as compensation for the damage to his reputation caused by a 2001 "expose" carried out by a news portal, which accused him of involvement in corruption related to defence procurement, media reports said.

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, who heard Major General M S Ahluwalia's case, ordered Tehelka.Com, its owner M/s Buffalo Communications, its proprietor Tarun Tejpal, and two reporters, Aniruddha Bahal and Mathew Samuel, to make the payment.

The judge emphasized that this was a clear and severe case of defaming an honest Army officer, and an apology made 23 years after the publication was "not only insufficient but meaningless".

However, the court ruled that the plaintiff failed to establish any defamation committed by Zee Telefilm Ltd and its officials when broadcasting the story as per their arrangement with the news portal.

The court further noted that the plaintiff not only suffered a decline in public estimation but also endured severe damage to his character due to serious corruption allegations, which cannot be rectified or healed by any subsequent refutation.

On March 13, 2001, the news portal published a story titled "Operation West End," which alleged corruption in defence deals related to the import of new defence equipment.

The plaintiff, represented by lawyer Chetan Anand, contended that he was defamed in the said story, as it falsely broadcast and reported that he had accepted a bribe.

In its 48-page judgment, the court dismissed the defence of "truth," "public good," and "good faith" raised by the defendants.

It emphasised that there could not be a more damaging defamation to a person of integrity than falsely imputing that he had demanded and accepted a bribe of Rs 50,000.

The court further highlighted that as a consequence of such reporting, a Court of Inquiry was initiated against the plaintiff. Although no misconduct was proven, the plaintiff faced "serious displeasure."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.