August 17, 2026 04:22 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After SC rebuke, BCI chief apologises to NALSAR students over enrolment freeze row | Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe
Ashneer Grover
Image Credit: Instagram/Ashneer Grover

Delhi HC rejects BhartPe cofounder Ashneer Grover's plea against probe in Rs 81 cr fraud allegations

| @indiablooms | Jun 02, 2023, at 12:01 am

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Thursday denied the request to halt the investigation against Ashneer Grover, co-founder of BharatPe, and his wife Madhuri Jain Grover in a case involving an alleged fraud of Rs 81 crore, media reports said.

Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani also declined to order the investigating officer to provide advance notice to the couple if their custody was sought, instead advising them to file an anticipatory bail application.

The case was filed by the fintech unicorn BharatPe against its co-founder.

The judge issued a notice on the petition filed by Grover and his wife, seeking to dismiss the FIR registered by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police.

The court also requested the investigating agency and BharatPe, the complainant, to present their positions.

The court also issued a notice regarding the application to stay the investigation.

“No case is made out at least at this stage for staying investigation in the matter. So far as advance written notice of arrest is concerned, petitioners are at liberty to adopt other remedies available to them in accordance with law,” the court said, reported NDTV.

“File section 438 (of CrPC for anticipatory bail). Why should I get into my inherent power when there is a statutory power,” the court stated.

The counsel representing the petitioners argued that the FIR was filed with malicious intent and the allegations raised concerned GST and the management of the company, which, as directors, they were authorized to handle without any criminality.

It was asserted that the petitioners played a significant role in developing the company into a multi-crore enterprise, and no fraudulent activities were flagged by the statutory auditors.

The Economic Offences Wing (EOW) filed the FIR earlier this year, invoking eight sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Section 406 for criminal breach of trust, Section 420 for cheating and dishonesty, and Sections 467 and 468 for forgery.

In the complaint lodged by BharatPe, it was alleged that Ashneer Grover and his family inflicted a loss of approximately Rs 81.3 crore through various illegal activities.

They allegedly made payments to fictitious human resource consultants, inflated and unwarranted payments through vendors associated with the accused, fraudulent transactions related to input tax credit and penalties to GST authorities, unauthorized payments to travel agencies, forgery of invoices by Madhuri Jain, and destruction of evidence.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.