January 02, 2026 05:13 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
New Year horror in Switzerland: Dozens feared dead in Crans-Montana bar explosion | Tobacco stocks crushed as govt slaps fresh excise duty from Feb 1 | Vodafone Idea shares explode 10% after surprise settlement and govt relief boost | No third party involved: India govt sources refute China’s Operation Sindoor ceasefire claim | Amit Shah blasts TMC over border fencing; Mamata fires back on Pahalgam and Delhi blast | 'A profound loss for Bangladesh politics': Sheikh Hasina mourns Khaleda Zia’s death | PM Modi mourns Khaleda Zia’s death, hails her role in India-Bangladesh ties | Bangladesh’s first female Prime Minister Khaleda Zia passes away at 80 | India rejects Pakistan’s Christmas vandalism remarks, cites its ‘abysmal’ minority record | Minority under fire: Hindu houses torched in Bangladesh village

Deadline for linking Aadhaar to welfare schemes extended to Dec. 31, Centre tells SC

| | Aug 30, 2017, at 07:38 pm
New Delhi, Aug 30 (IBNS) : The Centre on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court that the deadline for the mandatory linking of Aadhaar to social welfare schemes for availing their benefits has been extended from September 30 to December 31, 2017, The Hindu reported.

Attorney General K.K. Venugopal submitted before a Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra about the extension in deadline during an urgent mentioning in the court by petitioners who have challenged the validity of the Aadhaar scheme and the Aadhaar Act of 2016.

The petitioners, represented by senior advocate Shyam Divan, wanted an early hearing since the last date for linking the Aadhaar cards of beneficiaries to these welfare schemes fell on September 30.

On hearing  Venugopal's submission that the deadline has been extended, the Bench posted the Aadhaar petitions for hearing to November first week.

The Bench, led by Justie J. Chelameswar, had referred the petitions for hearing before a five-judge Bench, keeping in mind the pertinent legal question - whether privacy is a fundamental right or not - that had to be answered first.

The five-judge Bench had referred the legal question to a nine-judge Bench to nunerically overcome the MP Sharma and Kharak Singh judgments, which had declared that privacy is not a fundamental right.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.