August 03, 2026 03:22 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Kulgam terror attack turns deadlier: Second Chhattisgarh worker succumbs to bullet injuries | 'I'm ashamed': Girl who abused PM Modi during NEET protests issues apology | 'Abuses never solve anything': PM Modi urges forgiveness after Jantar Mantar protest slogans | 'Country wanted an apology, PM forgave it': Congress' sharp swipe at Modi's video over 'abuse' row | Bengal STF arrests JeM suspect from Burdwan; probe underway into 'plot' targeting CM Suvendu Adhikari | 'My father was almost lynched': Families of Delhi cops assaulted during NEET protests share chilling accounts | Nine killed after 'dangerous' building collapses in Maharashtra | Shehzad Poonawalla quits BJP, drops party name from X bio—big political twist | Meta India head Arun Srinivas booked over alleged anti-Modi posts during NEET protests | 'I received threats to join BJP': CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke's explosive allegation sparks fresh political row

CJI Ranjan Gogoi reconstitutes bench to hear Ayodhya case

| @indiablooms | Jan 25, 2019, at 08:27 pm

New Delhi, Jan 25 (IBNS): Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi on Friday reconstituted the Constitution bench that will hear the Ayodhya case on January 29, said reports.

The reconstitution of the five-judge bench was necessitated because Justice U.U. Lalit had recused himself from the five-judge bench saying he had been a lawyer in a related case.

Justice Abdul Nazeer and Justice Ashok Bhushan were added to the bench by the CJI on Friday. Justice N.V. Ramana, has been excluded from the new bench.

Apart from the two new judges and the CJI, the others in the bench would be Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice S.A. Bobde.

What is the case?

The Supreme Court will hear pleas challenging Allahabad High Court's verdict which divided 2.77-acre disputed Ayodhya land among Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara.

The apex court will decide whether Ram temple can be built in the same disputed land, where Babri Masjid was held till 1992.

Background of the case:

In 1992, the disputed Babri Masjid structure was brought down by several right-wing volunteers who believe Lord Ram was born at that land.

On September 27, the apex court had refused to re-visit its 1994 verdict which had stated mosque was not important for Muslims to offer prayers, paving way for the hearing of the Ayodhya case.

Modi wants to wait for verdict:

Though several right-wing organisations had demanded an ordinance be passed by the central government to construct Ram temple in Ayodhya, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on January 1 said he will wait for the verdict to come.

Citing the government took action over triple talaq only after the top court verdict, Modi, in an interview with ANI, said: "I urge Congress people to allow the court proceedings to take place over the Ram temple case in the Supreme court. After the verdict comes, the government will initiate its action."

How the construction of Ram temple matters to BJP?

The verdict, if passed prior to 2019 General Elections, will boost up the BJP, whose political commitment was building Ram temple in Ayodhya.

After the adjournment of the hearing, the verdict has become uncertain before the Lok Sabha polls.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.