April 22, 2026 02:37 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘PM Modi is a terrorist’: Mallikarjun Kharge sparks row; BJP hits back | ‘What kind of order is this?’: Mamata slams ECI’s bike curbs in poll-bound Bengal, calls it ‘mischief’ | ‘90% of women can’t do politics without entering male politicians’ rooms’: Pappu Yadav sparks row; BJP targets Congress | Tim Cook to step down as Apple CEO; John Ternus named successor | 15 killed, 20 injured as bus plunges into gorge in J&K’s Udhampur | Oil jumps over 5% as Strait of Hormuz closure fuels supply fears | Pushback from smartphone makers: Centre drops Aadhaar app pre-install plan — report | Meta eyes first wave of layoffs on May 20: Report | TCS breaks silence on Nida Khan: ‘No HR role, no power’ in Nashik case | ‘Panic reaction’: Rahul Gandhi on women’s bill, says PM Modi ‘wants to send a message’
Sedition

Centre seeks more time to respond to sedition pleas

| @indiablooms | May 02, 2022, at 08:20 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The central government on Monday sought more time from the Supreme Court to file its detailed written submissions on a batch of petitions challenging the Constitutional validity of the sedition law (Section 124-A of the Indian Penal Code).

The court had on April 27 asked the Union of India to file its counter by the end of this week but the Centre requested additional time to file its response.

The Centre filed an application before the Supreme Court and pleaded that the reply was ready but a sanction was needed from a department for which it needed more time in the matter.

Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, for one of the petitioners, said he was relying on three books in the sedition case.

He wanted the books to be taken on record.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice N V Ramana had on April 27 asked the Centre to file its counter by the end of this week and posted the batch of petitions for final hearing on May 5 and said no adjournment will be granted on that day.

The petitions argue that what constitutes seditious speech sparked a tussle between free speech and law on sedition which has been underway since the colonial era.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.