September 25, 2026 05:32 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death | 'Rahul Gandhi is devoid of wisdom and knowledge': BJP hits back over 'vote theft' claim | ‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation | Opposition readies fresh impeachment push against Gyanesh Kumar over SIR report | ‘Resign in 48 hours or face nationwide agitation’: CJP’s ultimatum to Gyanesh Kumar over SIR row | IIT Bombay student’s parents begin hunger strike, demand arrest of officials
Book Row
The circulation and ordered seizure of NCERT Class 8 Social Science textbooks banned over a controversial chapter on the judiciary. Representational photo by ChatGPT

'Book withdrawn': NCERT apologises for controversial judiciary chapter after Supreme Court ban

| @indiablooms | Mar 10, 2026, at 01:51 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) on Tuesday issued an unconditional apology over a now-banned controversial chapter on judicial corruption in a Class 8 Social Science textbook.

The council withdrew the book two weeks after the Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on its reprinting and online circulation.

In an official statement posted on X, NCERT said: “The Director and Members of NCERT hereby tender an unconditional and unqualified apology for Chapter IV. The entire book has been withdrawn and is not available.

“We sincerely regret the inconvenience caused and appreciate the understanding of all stakeholders. NCERT remains committed to maintaining the highest standards of accuracy, sensitivity, and responsibility in educational content.”

The top court had expressed dissatisfaction with NCERT’s initial response, noting the absence of a clear apology. The ban followed a suo motu case concerning the chapter titled “The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society.”

During the hearing, the bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant sought accountability from both the central government and NCERT, warning that the matter would not be closed until those responsible were identified.

The court also directed authorities to seize all existing copies of the textbook and issued notices to the Centre and NCERT Chairman Professor Dinesh Prasad Saklani.

The Chief Justice remarked sharply on the seriousness of the issue, stating it affected the credibility and integrity of the judiciary, and stressed that “…heads must roll! We won’t close the case.”

Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, representing NCERT, faced strong observations from the bench regarding the circumstances that led to the inclusion of the controversial content.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.