April 28, 2026 06:13 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Nothing like playing football’: PM Modi unwinds in Sikkim after Bengal poll blitz | Crackdown on D-Company: Dawood aide Salim Dola deported to India | Mumbai horror: Man asks two security guards to recite ‘kalma’, then stabs them | ‘Fair & Lovely Babua’: TMC jabs IPS officer Ajay Pal Sharma over viral video; Akhilesh joins attack | ‘Don’t regret later’: IPS officer Ajay Pal Sharma’s warning to TMC candidate sparks BJP-TMC clash | ‘Will return for swearing-in’: Modi ends Bengal campaign, signals BJP win | Top LeT commander Sheikh Yousuf Afridi gunned down in Pakistan—Mystery gunmen strike again | 'Had a child together, now alleges rape': SC says consensual live-in breakup is not a crime | YouTuber Saleem Wastik arrested in connection with 1995 kidnapping and murder case | Maharashtra Police makes first arrest months after Akshay Kumar revealed daughter’s cyber harassment
Book Row
The circulation and ordered seizure of NCERT Class 8 Social Science textbooks banned over a controversial chapter on the judiciary. Representational photo by ChatGPT

'Book withdrawn': NCERT apologises for controversial judiciary chapter after Supreme Court ban

| @indiablooms | Mar 10, 2026, at 01:51 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) on Tuesday issued an unconditional apology over a now-banned controversial chapter on judicial corruption in a Class 8 Social Science textbook.

The council withdrew the book two weeks after the Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on its reprinting and online circulation.

In an official statement posted on X, NCERT said: “The Director and Members of NCERT hereby tender an unconditional and unqualified apology for Chapter IV. The entire book has been withdrawn and is not available.

“We sincerely regret the inconvenience caused and appreciate the understanding of all stakeholders. NCERT remains committed to maintaining the highest standards of accuracy, sensitivity, and responsibility in educational content.”

The top court had expressed dissatisfaction with NCERT’s initial response, noting the absence of a clear apology. The ban followed a suo motu case concerning the chapter titled “The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society.”

During the hearing, the bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant sought accountability from both the central government and NCERT, warning that the matter would not be closed until those responsible were identified.

The court also directed authorities to seize all existing copies of the textbook and issued notices to the Centre and NCERT Chairman Professor Dinesh Prasad Saklani.

The Chief Justice remarked sharply on the seriousness of the issue, stating it affected the credibility and integrity of the judiciary, and stressed that “…heads must roll! We won’t close the case.”

Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, representing NCERT, faced strong observations from the bench regarding the circumstances that led to the inclusion of the controversial content.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.