September 25, 2026 05:34 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation | Opposition readies fresh impeachment push against Gyanesh Kumar over SIR report | ‘Resign in 48 hours or face nationwide agitation’: CJP’s ultimatum to Gyanesh Kumar over SIR row | IIT Bombay student’s parents begin hunger strike, demand arrest of officials | Nandigram bypoll shock: Calcutta HC shields Congress candidate Milan Pradhan in 2007 case, but will he walk free? | ‘I don’t care if you die’: Driver’s chilling response before Noida bus went up in flames | Contempt case against CEC Gyanesh Kumar? Supreme Court advocate seeks AG's consent | Days after Jamui outrage, another girl sexually harassed in Bihar; 4 arrested | 9 burnt to death as sleeper bus carrying 35 catches fire on Noida highway | ‘Gyanesh, it’s done bro!’: CJP turns up heat on CEC after explosive SIR report
Representative image showing husband-wife maintenance dispute in a courtroom. Photo: ChatGPT

Bombay HC denies maintenance to US-based woman earning more than husband, cites AI job risk

| @indiablooms | Jul 26, 2026, at 12:53 pm

The Bombay High Court has refused to grant interim maintenance to a woman living in New Jersey, noting that she earns more than her husband and that his IT job could face uncertainty amid increasing competition and the growing use of artificial intelligence.

The woman, who has been living in the United States since 2011, earns around Rs 8 lakh a month, or $8,700, from her job with New Jersey-based Mark Infotech Inc. Her husband also works in the IT sector.

A division bench of Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Manjusha Deshpande dismissed her plea seeking interim maintenance of Rs 1 lakh per month.

‘Higher cost of living abroad not enough’

The court observed that the higher cost of living in the US, by itself, cannot be a sufficient reason for awarding interim maintenance, particularly when the woman is a qualified professional with a substantial independent income.

The woman had argued that despite earning a steady salary, her income was insufficient to maintain the lifestyle she had enjoyed during the marriage, especially given the higher cost of living in the US.

The High Court, however, considered the financial circumstances of both spouses before rejecting her interim claim.

Husband’s IT job faces AI-driven uncertainty

The court also took note of the husband's employment situation.

While he too works in the IT sector, the court observed that increasing competition and automation driven by AI could put his job at risk.

Reports on the judgment said the husband has a non-technical background and has only basic SAP training.

The court's observation came in the context of assessing his earning capacity and financial position vis-à-vis the wife's substantially higher income.

Family Court had earlier rejected maintenance plea

The woman had initially approached a family court seeking interim maintenance. Her application was rejected, although the court directed her husband to pay Rs 25,000 towards litigation expenses.

The family court also dealt with the custody of the couple's two children. The elder child remains in the father's custody, while the younger child is with the mother.

The woman subsequently challenged the family court's order before the Bombay High Court.

Court dismisses plea for Rs 1 lakh monthly maintenance

The High Court ultimately declined to award the woman the Rs 1 lakh monthly interim maintenance she had sought.

The ruling highlights that maintenance claims cannot be determined solely by differences in the cost of living between India and the US.

The court also considered the wife's own earnings and the husband's employment prospects while assessing the claim.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.