July 26, 2026 12:54 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Victory of democracy': Sonam Wangchuk congratulates Gen Z as Dharmendra Pradhan resigns after month-long NEET protests | 'Democracy has triumphed': CJP celebrates as Dharmendra Pradhan quits, warns Centre 'Don't mess with cockroaches' | Centre buckles under CJP-led NEET protests; Dharmendra Pradhan quits as Education Minister | Delhi Police flags 2,500 suspected criminals at Jantar Mantar amid NEET protest | 'No assurances, sack Dharmendra Pradhan': CJP fires back at PM Modi over NEET row | 'Don't insult students': Rahul Gandhi tears into PM Modi's midnight NEET video, demands Dharmendra Pradhan's exit | Trump slaps fresh tariffs on India, China and 58 others over forced labour concerns | Sonam Wangchuk ends 26-day hunger strike after 'long negotiations', urges CJP protesters to maintain peace | PM Modi promises fresh steps on paper leaks in late night video | NEET protest: Centre invites CJP for talks; protesters stick to Jantar Mantar or neutral venue demand

Ayodhya case hearing in Supreme Court to end today

| @indiablooms | Oct 16, 2019, at 10:58 am

New Delhi: Daily hearing in the highly politically-sensitive case- which pertains to whether Ram Temple can be built in Uttar Pradesh's Ayodhya- will conclude on Wednesday, media reports said.

The hearing will conclude by 5 pm.

The top court is likely to pass the verdict by Nov 17 when Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi will leave his office.

Section 144, which bars assembly of four or more people in an area, is already imposed in Ayodhya to avoid any untoward incident.

The Supreme Court resumed the day-to-day hearings on the case on Monday after a week-long Dussera holiday.

What happened in Ayodhya and why the case is significant?

In 1992, the disputed Babri Masjid structure was brought down by several right-wing volunteers who believe Lord Ram was born on that site.

On Sept 27 last year, the apex court had refused to re-visit its 1994 verdict which had stated mosque was not important for Muslims to offer prayers, paving way for the hearing of the Ayodhya case.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.